Quantcast
Channel: The Allen Ginsberg Project
Viewing all 1329 articles
Browse latest View live

Meditation and Poetics - (Whitman 8)

$
0
0


Ginsberg on Whitman continues

I'm extending this discussion so far because, when considered this way, it does bring up the problem, then, (of), has he [Whitman] given up his self, or is he actually trying to find a way to fit himself in, without sacrificing self? He's not giving up love at all, he's not giving up his private parts. And from that point of view, there are a few poems that he wrote in old age that are, like, a funny commentary on this idealism. In "Sands at Seventy" (on page three-hundred-and-ninety-four of the Modern Library book), there are a couple of real interesting short notations in his old age - [Allen reads from Whitman] - "As I sit writing heresick and grown old,/Not my least burden is that dullness of the years, querilties/ Ungracious glooms, aches, lethargy, constipation, whimpering, ennui,/May filter in my daily songs." - [There's another, more realistic, view, imposed by suffering, of old age - and in another - "Queries To My Seventieth Year"] - "Approaching, nearing, curious./Thou dim, uncertain spectra - bringest thou life or death?/Strength, weakness, blindness, more paralysis and heavier?/Or placid skies and sun? Wilt stir the waters yet?/Or haply cut me short for good? Or leave me here as now,/Dull, parrot-like and old, with crack'd voice harping, screeching?" - [I thought it was great that he includes that, when he got old enough, to include that view of self, rather than the noble erotic self, the constipated, screeching, harping.] - So I would say from those old age poems that he was making an accurate record of the phenomena of self as it appeared, when it appeared, and that he was not clinging, necessarily, for any fixed identity for that self, or fixed noble ideal for that self, but was able to include all the variations, or all of the changes, sufficient to make it an ugly self, or to present the ugliness of self-hood as well as the beauty. There's a kind of prajna or wisdom in that, (and) generosity, certainly a lot of patience. So I would say, basically, he passes the line. He passes and gets an A, or an A-minus, or something, An A-minus in Egolessness. Because there is that frankness and willingness to acknowledge any thought, any change. 

[Audio for the above can be heard here, beginning at approximately twenty-eight-and-a-half-minutes in and concluding at approximately thirty-one-and-a-half minutes in]    


Lawrence Ferlinghetti's Birthday

$
0
0
















"There's always hope in love. Love and hate are viruses. Love can make a civilization bloom and hate can kill a civilization" - Lawrence Ferlinghetti is ninety-six years old today. Many happy returns of the day, Lawrence! 

The quote comes from a revealing profile from San Francisco news station, KQED (including a must-see video portrait by Adam Grossberg - Ferlinghetti bemoans what's happened to his home-town, San Francisco - and all over!)

"With Lawrence Ferlinghetti's last breath, San Francisco will become a different city" ( San Francisco - A Map of PerceptionsAndrea Ponsi).  

Previous Ferlinghetti birthday posts on the Allen Ginsberg Project, here, here, here and here

Currently up at the Marin Museum of Contemporary Art - Legends of the Bay Area - Lawrence Ferlinghetti. The show will be up until April 5th

Ferlinghetti's next book, Writing Across The Landscape - Travel Journals (1950-2013) (edited by Giada Diano and Matthew Gleeson), will be coming out this Fall (due out from Liveright in September) 




and, prior to that, (in June, from City Lights) - I Greet You At The Beginning of A Great Career - The Selected Correspondence of Lawrence Ferlinghetti and Allen Ginsberg (1955-1997) (edited by Bill Morgan).


Meditation and Poetics - (Whitman 9)

$
0
0
Student: Allen, what does he (Whitman)  mean by "soul"?

AG: I wonder - What does he mean by “soul”. Well I think we have to read on more because he’s going to define it. And he changes the meaning, actually a number of times. so you can’t really…

Here is one suggestion, a little later on, from the Calamus section [of Leaves of Grass] (I’ve mentioned it before, but see how (it) relates to his celebrating his soul) – [Allen reads from Whitman] – “Are you the new person drawn toward me?/ To begin with, take warning, I am surely far different from what you suppose;/ Do you suppose you will find in me your ideal?/ Do you think it so easy to have you become my lover?/ Do you think the friendship of me would be unalloy’d satisfaction?/ Do you think I am trusty and faithful?/ Do you see no further than this façade, this smooth and tolerant manner of me?/ Do you suppose yourself advancing on real ground toward a real heroic man?/ Have you no thought, O dreamer, that it  may be all maya, illusion?”  - [So he’s willing to admit that – that little glimpse of sunyata or that little break in the façade – “Do you see no further than this façade, this smooth and tolerant manner of me?”..]

In the Song of Myself”  itself, there are sections where he breaks up and cracks up, has little nervous breakdowns  about his identity and about his assertion, or about his universal potent power, or the universal power of his empathy.

As to what his definition of “soul” is, there is on page twenty-eight - Section Six – “A child said What is the grass, fetching it to me with full hands, / How could I answer the child? I do not know what it is anymore than he” – [“Soul” – “Grass”] -  “I guess it must be the flag of my disposition..” – [ I guess the soul must be “the flag of my disposition”, if you wanted to interpret it that way. so he’ll give various definitions now] – ““I guess it must be the flag of my disposition, out of hopeful green stuff woven/ Or I guess it is the handkerchief of the Lord,/ A scented gift and a remembrancer divinely dropt,/Bearing the owner’s name somewhere in the corners, that we may see and remark and say, Whose?” – “Or I guess the grass is itself a child, the produced babe of the Vegetation./  Or I guess it is a uniform hieroglyphic,/And it means, Sprouting alike in broad zones and narrow zones,/Growing among black folks as among white,/ Kanuck, Tuckahoe, Congressman, Cuff, I give them the same, I receive them the same./ And now it seems to me the beautiful uncut hair of graves/” – “Tenderly will I use you, curling grass,/ It nay be you transpire from the breasts of young men/ It may be if I had known them I would have loved them,/It may be you are from old people , or from offspring taken soon out of their mothers’ laps/ And here you are, the mothers’ laps./ This grass is very dark to be from the white heads of old mothers,/Darker than the colorless beards of old men,/ Dark to come from the faint red roofs of mouths” – [That’s very interesting, that “faint red roofs of mouths”, that’s really good – like (William Carlos) Williams or (Charles) Reznikoff – just as accurate perception – “the “faint red roofs of mouths”, Very few people get that close inside a mouth, ever] – “ Or I perceive after all so many uttering tongues,/And I perceive they do not come from the roofs of mouths for nothing./ I wish I could translate the hints about the dead young men and women,/ And the hints about old men and mothers , and the offspring taken soon out of their laps,/ What do you think has become of the young and old men?/And what do you think has become of the women and children? / They are alive and well somewhere,/ The smallest sprout shows there is really no death,/ And if ever there was it led forward life, and does not wait at the end to arrest it,/ And ceas’d the moment life appear’d./ All goes onward and outward, nothing collapses,/ And to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.”

Well, can you figure out a “soul” from that? – “And to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.” -Well, I couldn’t figure out a fixed soul from that. So I don’t know what he meant by “soul”, except the observing intelligence, or the observing sympathy. The sympathetic observer, or, as he will extend it later on, I guess, that Person, open, tolerant , or that aspect of Person which is open, tolerant mind, which sees everything, emphasizes with everything, doesn’t judge anything, simply shines out. Like the line (in) To a Common Prostitute” – “Not till the sun rejects you do I reject you”. In other words, a mind energetic, continuous, observant, out-flowing, as the  sun (which is actually our own minds, as Williams pointed out – “Who shall say I’m not the happy genius of my household, if I behave like a naked idiot in my attic?” - "Who shall say that I am not/the happy genius of my household?") . That is, the same mind which [sic] “must have a part in everything” - ("Must you have a part in everything?"), which smells out everything, in Williams’ poem “Smell, remember? I think it’s that quality of inquisitiveness of mind. Inquisitive tolerance or what (William) Burroughs would call “benevolent indifferent attention”, or what (Jiddu) Krishnamurti would call “choiceless awareness”, or what the Buddhists would call bodhicitta, which is to say wakened mind, which is non-judgmental.

There are certain moments in Whitman where there’s some kind of correlation – that the soul actually is just empty mind (empty, in the sense of accepting), all-accommodating, accommodating mind. Accommodating mind. Certainly you could say that about Whitman – accommodating mind. The nature of Buddhist wakefulness, that’s the terminology for that – Accommodating mind.



However, there is no reference, in the traditional Buddhist shot, to “God”, “soul”, or “self” in that accommodating mind. Whitman proposes the word “Person” and “self” for the same awareness or accommodating mind, from his nineteenth-century vocabulary – adequate, quite adequate, actually. Because he’s changed the meaning of “self” here. He’s actually made not “me-self” but “me-self-same-as-your-self”. So, whatever is elemental and common in self  (which would be open, accommodating mind). And the whole “Song of Myself” (then) is the song of open, accommodating mind, rather than closed-in, selfish, self-hood (though there is constant struggle for him to deal with what his self-hood desires – the homosexual, say – and to (thus) accommodate women - In other words, because he’s proclaiming self as complete accommodating mind then he has to start accommodating). So there’s this conflict between what he naturally accommodates and what he feels he’s got to accommodate. But I think he is, just, sort of like everybody else, dealing with the problems of self-hood, the obstacles to accommodation. The special desires, graspings, and obsessions are opportunities for more recognition, and for more opening up.

[Audio for the above can be heard here, beginning at approximately thirty-one-and-a-half minutes in and concluding at approximately forty-and-a-quarter minutes in]

Gregory Corso's Birthday

$
0
0

[photo: Chris Felver ca. 1980] 

[photo:  Hank O'Neal, 1985]

[photo: Hank O'Neal, 1985] 



[photo: Francis Miller, 1959] 

[photo: Allen Ginsberg, 1961]

[photo: Allen Ginsberg, 1961]

[photo: Pamela Hansen,1989]

[photo: Elsa Dorfman, 1973] 

[photo: Gordon Ball, 1973] 



[Photos by Allen Ginsberg] 

Another Beat anniversary. Eighty-five years ago today, in New York City's Greenwich Village (St Vincent's Hospital) - the birth of (Nunzio)Gregory Corso

Plenty of Gregory, if you search through the archives here at the Allen Ginsberg Project, starting with our 2011 posting (after his own book-title) - Happy Birthday of Death

Here's our last year's (2014) birthday shout-out

and here's our posting from the year before

Rick Schober's long-in-the-making - The Whole Shot - Collected Interviews with Gregory Corso seems happily immanent

Here's Gregory, talking about Jack Kerouac



Gregory Corso (1930-2001),  buon compleanno, certifiable Beat legend. 

Friday's Weekly Round-Up - 214

$
0
0

Allen Ginsberg's family - Hannah (Honey) Litzky, aunt; Leo Litzky, uncle; Abe Ginsberg, uncle; Anna Ginsberg, aunt; Louis Ginsberg, father; Eugene Brooks, brother; Allen Ginsberg, poet; Anne Brooks, niece; Peter Brooks, nephew; Connie Brooks, sister-in-law; Lyle Brooks, nephew; Eugene Brooks; Neal Brooks, nephew; Edith Brooks, stepmother, Louis Ginsberg, Paterson, New Jersey, May 3 1970, 1993 - Gelatin silber print 96 x 240 inches (243.8 x 609.6 cm) - edition of 3 - (c) The Richard Avedon Foundation - from the collection of the Israel Museum, Jerusalem]

Next week in Philadelphia at the National Museum of American Jewish History (from April 1st through to August 2nd) - Richard Avedon - Family Affairs - the only US venue for this important photographic exhibition, featuring the famous Ginsberg-family group-portrait.

The day before that, in New York, at thePoets House, Ed SandersSeeking The Glyph - an exhibition and artist's talk - "selected drawings and daybooks by Edward Sanders from 1962 to the present exploring his colorful script of hand-draw characters, symbols and graphemes" (that exhibition remains on view until May 23rd).

Big news - Ed's Allen Ginsberg book - The Poetry and Life of Allen Ginsberg is now available on line at woodstockjournal.com -   here's a link to that poem.























(Note also on woodstockjournal.com, the important developments in the case to uncover the true facts  behind the assassination of Robert F Kennedy. Connect also to robertfkennedy-justicedenied.com. Spread the word.)


                                                       [Mohammed Ibn al-Dheeb al-Ajami]

It was UNESCO World Poetry Day last Saturday and PEN International marked the occasion in a special - and useful - way,  "by directing public attention to the imprisonment, murder, and general harassment of poets, writers and journalists" - "We will be focusing on five cases that highlight the threats faced by writers who criticize those in power - Aran Atabek (Kazakhstan), [in prison since 2007, and much of it in solitary confinement],  Mohammed Ibn al-Dheeb al-Ajami (Qatar), [incredibly, serving a life-sentence for publicly reciting a poem!],  Enoh Meyomesse(Cameroon), [serving a politically-motivated seven-year sentence], [the murdered poet and activist], Susana Chávez Castillo (Mexico), and Liu Xia (China), [wife of jailed Nobel peace prize-winner, Liu Xiaobo, currently kept against her will and laboring under house arrest].""These cases are already well-known to PEN members, who have been campaigning on their behalf for years. Sadly, there has been little significant progress made towards justice in any of these cases." 


  
Lawrence Ferlinghetti's 96th birthday this past week. For our Ginsberg Project posting see here 
For the PBS segment (Ferlinghetti on San Francisco gentrification), along with a transcript, see here
Pioneer of free speech - Lawrence Ferlinghetti.


                                                            [Lawrence Ferlinghetti]

and, (following up on a story we reported on earlier), on a not-unrelated note...

Remembering Jack Kerouac - 1

$
0
0




Remembering Jack – 1 Allen Ginsberg, John Clellon Holmes, Gregory Corso and Edith Parker Kerouac

We've been featuring recently (hereand here) some readings from the 1982 Naropa On The Road Conference celebrating Jack Kerouac. This weekend - a panel discussion. Allen explains:
"Our idea was to go through, each one tell how we first met (Jack) Kerouac, center on that, and then, if we have enough time, to go around again or combine it with one literary hit off of Kerouac"

Participants are Allen Ginsberg, Gregory Corso, Peter Orlovsky,Michael McClure, John Clellon Holmes,David Amram, Fernanda Pivano, Ann Charters,andEdith Parker Kerouac. Periodic shout-outs for Carl Solomon,Herbert Huncke,  Lawrence Ferlinghetti,Carolyn Cassady, Diane di Primaand Jan Kerouac to come up to the podium and speak remain unanswered 

The tape begins with about five full minutes of announcements (including announcement of a meditation session - "the last one was very successful, with about..about a hundred people came, so the more the merrier") before Allen takes over 
(Allen and Gregory Corso are the de facto co-ordinators of the event). 

The complete tape may be listened to here.

AG: So I’ll start. Our idea was to go through, each one tell how we first met (Jack) Kerouac, center on that, and then, if we have enough time, to go around again or combine it with one literary hit off of Kerouac, See, Edie Parker knew Lucien Carr from drinking at the West End (bar). I was living across the hall, on the seventh floor of the Union Theological Seminary, in New York City, near Columbia (University), during the war, 1944, when the dormitories were filled with young navy trainees, so that the college students were bumped and they had to go live at the Union Theological Seminary dorm, and I heard Brahms, Trio number 1, coming outside of Lucien’s door, the music, so I knocked and saw Lucien Carr looking  like an angel, and made friends, and a few days later, he had met Edie Parker at the time (she was) called, at the West End bar at 113th Street on West End (Avenue) and Broadway, where all the college kids drank, and Lucien told me about this guy he had met who had just come back from the ocean, was a sailor but wore a black leather jacket and who had a ..who was a poet, and a novelist - and that was the first time I ran into someone who was a writer - because I was going to Columbia University and there were no writers there.

Gregory Corso; What year? 

AG: Nobody boasted of being a writer in 1944,  in the summer of 1944. There was no one who claimed being a writer or a poet. So I found out where he lived, (and I think it was an apartment that Edie Parker’s mentioned somewhere or other this week), right off Columbia University on 105th.. (no,) 118thStreet, climbed up, knocked on the door. I think Edie or Jack opened the door, and he was sitting there, eating breakfast, wearing a t-shirt and chino pants, and he was amazingly handsome, like really young (I don’t know how old he was at that point, but..when was he born?)

AG: So he’d be twenty-two years old - really sharp-looking, like dark, handsome, deep deep deep eyes, (beautiful in a way, as Jan Kerouac is quite beautiful right now at a little older age) but I remember eyes and (a) handsome straight nose, so I immediately dug him as a sort of a..well, as what? - not as a (guy) – I’d never been laid, anyway, see, I was a virgin and completely innocent and scared, and nobody knew I was queer, to begin with. So I was there under false pretenses as some kind of studious intelligent interested student going up to meet him for what reason? - well, he couldn’t figure it out and I couldn’t figure it out, and he was eating his eggs. And so I said, “well, um..bla-bla-bla”.., and he said "bla-bla-bla”. And then he said.. something, and I said. "well, discretion is a better part of valor” (which is something I heard from my father, constantly telling me “discretion is a better part of valor” – and I hardly knew what it meant!  - except it was something that I would drop into the conversation when I couldn’t think of anything to say and I wanted to appear smart because I felt like a complete fool). So he gave me a funny look that I’ve seen in movies like [Allen mimics], that he gave Steve Allen [on his tv show] like..a grimace..a side--grimace of the mouth meaning “What is that?, What’s that for?” and he decided that I was..I guess he must have decided that I was a New York Jewish Intellectual. Then, that day..

John Clellen Holmes: Pretty good take!

AG:  ...that very day, that same day (or another in that same week, see, it’s melted into my memory as the same), I had to move from Union Theological Seminary to.. following Lucien Carr who had moved to a hotel on 115thStreet. So I decided I’d move out and go to the hotel..and I asked Jack to help me move  or walk me down (so we had to walk down the Columbia campus from 118th to 125thStreet and through the campus and up seven flights, down a long wooden corridor, in a Theological Seminary setting, to an arched brown open door, where I brought out my valise.. so I took my valise out and turned to the door and closed the door, and said, “Goodbye door”, and Jack said “Ooh?”, and then we walked down (to) the rest of the corridor, and I said “Goodbye corridor”, and he said “Mmm”. And then I said, “Goodbye step number one, goodbye step number two” (because we had seven flights of steps to go down). And he said, “What do you mean?” And I said, “Well, I know I’ll never see it again in the same body (or if I’m in the same body, it’ll be years, twenty-five years later, or forty years later , and so it’ll be like walking back into an ancient interesting classical dream”. And he said,  “Do you think like that all the time?” And I said, “Oh, I always think like that…. Nobody else does but me, I think, maybe", or "does anybody else ever think of those thoughts?"- like one day, I remember, when I was walking home from the Fabian Theater in Paterson, I was passing by the hedges by the church near Broadway and Paterson, and I thought, “Gee, I wonder how big the universe is? – and at the end of the universe is there a wall? and what would the wall be made out of? rubber? – but if it was a wall made of rubber would the wall of rubber go on then for another billion miles? - and what would come after the rubber? ...so where does… how do you.. how do you finish.. what is the end of the universe?"

Gregory Corso: I know, Al, I can tell you. It’s spherical like a bubble (you know, like your water bubble) but there’s another little bubble that’s attached to it.
John Clellon Holmes: Is that it?
AG: Yeah.. that means I can…
GC: Water bubbles
AG: Like that?
GC: Water bubbles, spherical, and then there’s another one attached to it, a little one attached to it.

AG: Well, I didn’t think of that at that age. So those were the kind of questions that Kerouac and I both thought about, and our first rapport was over the fact that both of us said goodbye all the time to the space where we were at that moment, realizing that the space was floating in the infinite universe, and that the universe is changing, and that we were transient, interesting, charming phantoms, appreciating the space around, and that we were only there for that  hour or two and so we were constantly saying “goodbye”  
Gregory Corso: So that answers that then.  When was that? early? 
AG: John Holmes (next) then
Gregory Corso: John Holmes

                                             [John Clellon Holmes and Jack Kerouac]

John Clelland Holmes: Well.. Is this microphone is working.. can you hear me?   Yeah -  I, in the late Spring of 1948, I heard about somebody called Jack Kerouac. A friend of mine who was then working for, of all places, the New Yorker magazine, knew Allen – Ed Stringham– and through Allen, he heard about somebody called Jack Kerouac, who had written, and almost completed, an enormous novel   that weighed forty pounds or something!  =- So Stringham told me and another friend of mine, both of whom were aspiring novelists, about this, and we were quite eager to meet this guy, and the long weekend of July 4th  ]of that year, my wife was out of town, visiting her family, and (Alan) Harrington, the other guy, came to me and said, “Ginsberg called, and he and somebody else were throwing a party up in Russell Durgin’s apartment, or - [turning to Allen] - was that your apartment? – it was Russell’s I think

AG: What year is this?
JCH: (19)48
AG:  (19)48 and what date? July?
JCH: July
AG: I was probably living there because I took it for the summer
JCH:I think that you were living there but I think it was Russell’s apartment
AG: Yes, it was Russell’s apartment that I sub-let for the summer
JCH: So…that sounded good and the..I think, also, you, Allen, had told Alan Harrington that Kerouac would be there.
AG: And I think (Herbert) Huncke was living there at the time.
JCH: He wasn’t there that night
AG: OK

JCH: Sorry! – So off we went, it was hot, sweltery, got into Spanish Harlem, the streets were full of the smell of..the great smell of beans and there was plenty of music coming out of all the windows. And here.. we just hit a building that was just like any other building, and up we went to about the fourth or fifth floor (I can’t recall, it was up top)  and the closer we got to it, the noisier it became, and the music was not.. was not Latin music so much as it was jazz. And in we went, and I met Allen first, who was hosting it – [to Allen] - (at least you acted like a host), and there were a lot of people (I didn’t know any of them, didn’t know any of them, Lucien was there, I can’t remember any of the others, the oth ers were kind of, a kind of conglomeration of Columbia students- I don’t think John Hollander was there, but he was part of that crowd ). And Allen, as you probably all know who know him, is extremely generous and saw that we had beer (we brought some beer along anyway) and introduced us to a few people, and it was one of those typical poverty-stricken, tenement houses (all the rooms butted up on one another, there was no hall, you headed into the kitchen), all the windows were open because it was a hot night, and the beer was flowing.
And I went into the other room that I think you probably used as a living-room, which was where Russell had his books.. (no, (Herbert) Huncke lived there later, I never met him), and I did what I often do when I’m in a place where I don’t know or don’t know anybody, I kind of stood around and I checked out the guy’s books. Well they were primarily seventeenth-century and eighteenth-century English poets, and very fine editions as I recall. And then I looked over and there was a couch against one wall and there was a guy I’d never met, who turned out to be Jack.
I was just, like Allen, struck by his looks, immediately (undoubtedly, for many of the same reasons that you were struck by them). He was an arresting man to see, he was incredibly handsome, but beyond that he was a.. there was something in his face that was.. that you couldn’t take your eyes off.  There are certain movie stars that are like that, but not necessarily good actors, but the camera loves them, and you look at them. So I went over and he was very shy and withdrawn, until he learned that I was a writer too. Then he opened up a bit but both of us didn’t quite know what to make of one another. And you (Allen) [turning to Allen] hustled in and did what you so often kindly do, which is to make two strangers feel, with each other, feel at home, and so that’s how I met him. A week later, or about two weeks later, his novel was given to me, he gave it to me, it was in a huge doctors bag, as I recall  (and it did weigh about forty pounds – it was just about like that) and I read it with some interest, although I knew nothing about the man, except that he’d struck me as being somebody that I wanted to know. Of course, reading the book astounded me, and, almost immediately thereafter, he came by to my apartment for something, and we..and we just saw one another from then on.   That’s the first night.

AG: Yes, I’d completetly…
JCH: It was, it was the novel.
AG: You know, I’d completely forgotten about that party till he mentioned it now

                               [Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac and Gregory Corso - Photograph by  Bruce Davidson]

GC: Right, I’m the third one then?  - I’m 1950?  I can be 1950 or 1949 the middle of (19)49, towards its end, because I had come out of prison…at the..towards the end of (19)49, and that’s when I met Allen Ginsberg and, through Ginsberg, met Kerouac…[commenting on the mic] - is this working?
AG: You could take a a little distance..
GC: OK… I met Allen in a lesbian bar in Greenwich Village. I was in this lesbian bar because I was what? nineteen?  going on twenty. I was in this lesbian bar because a friend of mine was doing caricatures of people there, an artist, the first artist I ever met, his name was Emmanuel Diaz. Anyway, one night Allen comes in, and now I don’t know if by this time he’s out of the closet because you say when you met Kerouac you were what? virginal? Were you a virgin when you met me?
AG: No..nineteen fifty? no.. I don’t really remember now.
GC: Alright .. So I had a good-looking young Italian face, you know in 1950, twenty-years-old, so I figured that’s why he came up and spoke with me, but, I mentioned I was a poet and I had my prison poems with me, and Allen said, “I’ve got to introduce you to the Chinaman, then”. And the Chinaman in his head at that time was a good minor poet, who was Mark Van Doren, who was his teacher at Columbia. So he first brought me to Mark Van Doren. And after Mark Van Doren was Dusty Moreland, and this is how it worked. 
I told him I was living on Ninth Street and Sixth Avenue and there was this girl I’d watch go to the bathroom and have sex with a guy and all that, and I’d jerk off to it. And he said, “Where? what apartment?” and I’d tell him and he said, “Well I’m the guy that’s going to bed with that girl!  - And so I said, like wow! then you can bring me up there and introduce me, and so he did. So that was a beautiful coincidence, right? that Dusty Moreland. And I think maybe a month after that, a man in a white CIO cap?  - did he wear? CIO? from the merchant marine, a white shirt ,white pants – who’s apartment? there was a little room there on the side – was it your…
AG: NMU  - NMU cap – National Maritime Union?
GC: Yeah but I think it was the CIO that he belonged to.
AG: Yeah.
GC: But, alright.. what house did I meet him in when you brought me to introduce me to him?
AG: To Dusty or to whom?
GC: It wasn’t Dusty’s house.
AG:Henry Cru maybe?
GC: It was someone’s house, I don’t think it was yours
AG: Right near..Ninth Street?..Where was it?
GC: It was in New York City..
JCH: Is that the closest you can get!
GC: Anyway.. the closest…  and it was you and he alone and you introduced me to him
AG: I’m trying to figure out where that would be. Henry Cru was a friend of Jack, who had a place in..on..
GC: Did you go out the window on(to) a little roof?
[Audience Member]: (Twelve Street - Edie's place on Twelfth?)
AG: Gee..I…
GC: Or maybe that's the place, I don’t know
JCH: No, Edie wasn’t on the scene then.
GC: No, this is 1949, 1950. Anyway, ok..
[Audience Member] (Seventh Street?)
GC: No, nobody lived there till so much later. Come on, not Seventh Street not Sixteenth Street either, but anyway a place in New York City. And we hit it off right away Kerouac and I (there was some kind of warmth that they (Ginsberg and Holmes) both hit on was his features. I had him in a poem once ["Elegiac Feelings American"] with Clark Gable’s hands ["How so like Clark Gable hands.."]. That was the best way I could describe him, that way, like a movie actor, and very strong, you know Clark Gable had hairy hands, so did Jack. But did I tell him I had poetry, I wrote poetry, that was the ball-game. He had asked me what poetry was and I told him it was everything, you know. So that’s the first encounter with Mr Kerouac. Was it the end of (19)49 or the beginning of (19)50, I don’t know..I can find out..I can find out when I left prison.
JCH: I think it was (19)50. I met you soon after that
GC: Did I meet you the same year?
JCH: I met you in the early (19)50’s
GC: Early (19)50’s
JCH: Yeah
GC: That’s what I mean, it could have been late 1949 or …
JCH: It couldn’t have been (1949)
AG: I don’t remember your meeting with Kerouac. Do you?
GC: Yeah, you brought me there.
AG: Do you remember the conversation?
GC: Yeah – “What’s poetry?” because at that time, as a poet. I told him it was everything.
AG: And what did he say?
GC: He looked at me ..


AG: Actually we called before for Edie (Parker) Kerouac.. to
GC: Yeah here she is - You’re the earliest one to know him man, you’re 1940
AG: So maybe..why don’t you come down and  tell your story. What we’re doing is giving little..just short brief hits, how we met, Edie.
GC: But both of us met Kerouac through you.
JCH: Yes, right
GC: Allen was the catalyst of that
JCH: And he’s still doing it...
AG: Now Edie is..Edie was the catalyst for an earlier meeting with me and Jack and  (William)Burroughs and Lucien Carr. So if you’ll just sit over here and give us a little description of that, Edie, we’ll get that.. (How did your lecture go?… come on, sit down..taking big bows!).. then we’ll call Nanda (Pivano) back for the Italian.. connection.
So the question is how did you first meet Jack, first time?...

















[Edie Parker Kerouac (1922-1993)]

Edie Parker Kerouac: I first met.. I first met Henry Cru. I first went with Henry Cru, who lived in my grandmother’s apartment 438 West 116t Street, and his mother and my grandmother were friends, and me and Henry Cru liked each other, and he was going to Horace Mann with Jack (Kerouac), and he wanted me to meet his best friend. So he took me and he asked us out to lunch and we went to a New York delicatessen which I’m not used to and I sat down and immediately had six sauerkraut hot dogs and from that time on he fell in love with me
AG: You  said that the other day
EPK: I know and I…
GC: What year was this?
EPK: 1940
AG: That early, ok. Do you remember any of the first conversation at all?
EPL: I don’t think he said much at all.
AG: Yeah
EPK: Well I tell you..
AG: What was the first conversation you can remember?
EPK: To me?
AG: Yeah
EPK: Oh..
AG: Or with anyone?.. (It’s hard, actually.. thinking about..)
EPK: Impossible.
AG: Yeah
EPK: I’ll tell you what he did, Allen. He liked me. So the next day he wrote me a love letter
AG: Ah!
EPK: ...on one page
AG: So fast!
EPK: He delivered it by hand and he gave it to the bell-boy who brought it up to me and I was.. it was gorgeous. I wish I’d..
AG: What did it say?
EPK: Oh, oh my god, he called me his birdnote and his..
AG: His what?
EPK: Birdnote. He always called me his birdnote..
AG Bird note?
EPK: Uh-huh. and he talked about when he first met me that I walked on Amsterdam Avenue and that I fed a horse that was a beggar’s horse, a junk man’s horse, and he talked about that and he talked about that if I went into the deepest deepest part of the forest under the (den) where there was the deepest part of the forest, and I lifted up a rock, there I would find his heart.
AG: Hmm.
EPK: I remember that.
GC: Wow!
AG: And do you remember what book he was writing then?
EPK: Oh, I think it was The Sea is My Brother
AG: Yes..now do you remember anything about that book?
EPK: I’m really not kidding you Allen. I think it’s in the attic of my house.
AG: You have it?
EPK: Yes
AG: (Do) you have The Sea Is My Brother
EPK: Yes,  I think so.
AG: That’s a revelation. The long-lost manuscript!
EPK: I..when we moved from one house it was on the top of a shelf and it was thick like this and my sister and I would recall reading it..constantly.. but it did  go on and on – and on and on and on
AG: That was his first novel, which he was writing when he was a sailor going up the.. around..sailing around Greenland.
EPK: Yeah
AG: That was his big symbolic novel while he was readingThomas Mann –The Magic Mountain.But The Sea Is My Brother is like a..sort of classic title, and it was his first really Romantic prose, and it was the first extended work before The Town and the City.
GC: Eighteen? Eighteen years old?
EPK: Yes. Yeah. He never.. As long as I knew him he never stopped writing, never. He was always…
AG: Well how did you get that manuscript, did you just… he left it with you?
EPK: No, he lived with me in Grosse Pointe and he handed it to me.
AG: But when he visited, when you got married and he visited there, he just left it there?
EPK: Yeah,that's right, he left it there and he lost it. That’s where the picture is in my   a little book of the merchant marine with the white hat. It’s in my little book. And by the way, Gregory, I have a picture of Dusty Moreland.
GC: Oh great! Yeah, beautiful. My first lay when I got out of prison.
JCH: She was a knock-out too
AG: Listen, Dusty..I called Dusty to invite her to the conference and she was outraged at the way that I had referred to her in some letters that were published  and felt that I was wrong in not changing her name
GC: Yeah, I don’t blame her
AG: So she’s sensitive.so.. 
EPK: John Kingsland just gave it to me
GC: I want to see the picture when you have a chance.. 
















[Dorothy "Dusty" Moreland]

[A version of this text appeared in Beats at Naropa - An Anthology (edited by Anne Waldman and Laura Wright, Coffee House Press, 2009]

Remembering Jack Kerouac - 2

$
0
0


The 1982 memories of (Jack) Kerouac session at Naropa continues
(For the first part of this panel see yesterday)
Audio of these recollections can be found here
The transcript picks up at approximately twenty-seven-and-a-quarter minutes in, with a curiously subdued Peter Orlovsky



[Peter Orlovsky and Jack Kerouac=Photographs by Allen Ginsberg]

AG: Next will be Peter Orlovsky.
Gregory Corso: (And) what year for Peter?
AG: So that would be  probably around nineteen fifty…
Gregory Corso: … four
AG:  ...four, Christmas, or fifty-five, maybe mid fifty-five.
Peter Orlovsky – July was it?
AG: I guess. Sometime around then, yeah
Peter Orlovsky: Summertime?
AG: Summer… when you got back from New York
Peter Orlovsky: 1010 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, five and a half blocks from City Lights bookstore, we.. he came to see you then?
AG: I don’t remember
Peter Orlovsky: Well he was in the apartment
AG: At 1010 Montgomery
Peter Orlovsky: Right.. So what else do you remember from that..?...
So Jack was there and he banged on the bathroom door. I think Allen had told him (that) he was living with a friendly young cute boy and Jack got mad and said, you shouldn’t be doing the… [to Allen] - what did Jack say to you? – Yeah, he banged on the bathroom door and he cracked the bathroom door and I heard the noise and I said, "What’s this about?", and he.. you told me, “You shouldn’t do that”. He should "He was just a little upset. He doesn’t like me fooling around with young boys", or what?
Gregory Corso: How young were you, Peter.. ?
Peter Orlovsky: Oh, (19)55 - thirty-three
AG; I have no recollection of that, Pete, so you’d better tell.
Gregory Corso: How young a boy?
AG: That was Kerouac’s attitude but I have don't remember that incident, that’s all (but I’m glad you do)
Peter Orlovsky: 1010 Montgomery Street
Gregory Corso: Yeah
Peter Orlovsky: He was in a jacket. He was in a work jacket, workman’s jacket, maybe blue, or brown?..
AG:  Wearing chinos in those  days…those blue chinos
Peter Orlovsky: And..
John Clellon Holmes: ..chambray
Peter Orlovsky: …chambray..  And he was very friendly, He said “Hello, I’m Jack Kerouac" .and..and.. what else did he say (I wonder)?
Gregory Corso: How long was he there for? Was it after an hour or so?
AG: I don’t even remember him being at 1010 Montgomery. The first visual recollection of Jack I have in your presence is up on  Potrero Hill when we had that apartment
Peter Orlovsky : Oh,  No, that was.. We stayed at 1010 Montgomery for a while, and then..where did we move after Montgomery, was it Portrero Hill?...
Gregory Corso: So you see  your first recollections of Kerouac seem to be kind of dim in there. Like my conversation with him was he asked me, "What’s poetry?", and I said “everything”, and that was about it for the first shot. 
Peter Orlovsky: Well it was a summer afternoon, about three o’clock maybe… but I always remember Jack having notebooks in his pocket, and then the other… well, (at) the Six Gallery he was very happy and exuberant. When was… what month was the Six Gallery reading?
Gregory Corso: (19)56
Peter Orlovsky: That was(19)56?
Gregory Corso: Summertime, right?
[Audience-member]: Spring
Gregory Corso: Spring?
AG: None of us remember anything!
Gregory Corso: But Spring is Summer in San Francisco, right?
Peter Orlovsky: What was that?..almost nine months later?
AG: Yeah
Peter Orlovsky: So he was in San Francisco for..
Gregory Corso: Yeah
Peter Orlovsky:  In and out…
AG: The question is what flashes do you remember, not try to reconstruct, but just what do you remember? of him
Peter Orlovsky: The first?
AG: First
Peter Orlovsky:  Yeah, well that’s about it.
Gregory Corso: (But) the bathroom door was a heavyweight, you know, I mean, good god!

AG: He was always very resentful. And, actually, if you’re..  To check on that literarily, there’s that little Catullan poem that I wrote to Kerouac, saying that I had Peter, which has a line :”Your angry at me for all of my boyfriends, for all of my lovers”. So that Kerouac did have that reaction. It was some kind of  like real heavy mean, sort of mean-minded, mean-spirited put-down thing when it had to do with boys, when it was my boyfriends


                                       [Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg - Photograph by John Cohen]

AG: Yeah
Edie Parker Kerouac: I think Jack was very  moral
AG: Very! It wasn’t just his mother
Edie Parker Kerouac: Squeaky moral

Gregory Corso: I remember another thing. When I had come out of the prison.. I mean, in prison, it’s very rough to make friends. It took a while before you made any friends in prison, but when I came out of prison, you say you’re a poet -  poet? - quick friends. And so Kerouac and I were immediately fast friends - but actually just an acquaintance, that’s why when I went to bed with his girlfriend..Arlene Lee, right? - he writes The Subterraneans and has me pretty heavyweight in that book, that I was disloyal, that I went to bed with his girlfriend. Now, I didn’t know him that well, (and like Dusty..) So..

John Clellon Holmes: You didn’t think he had a right to say that to you?


                                                                    [Arlene Lee]

Gregory Corso: And I didn’t know who came on with whom.. the other girl..I think she came on to me a lot too. So anyway we laid, just once, we had one sex shot. But he writes The Subterraneans, and he had the manuscript done and he showed it to me, and in it he has, at the end, he picking up a table about to kill me, and I said, “Don’t do that, don’t have it.. just change it, don’t have it to end like that”,  because it did not happen, you see, that way. And then he did, he changed it, how did he change it? well, he picks it up and his whole mind changes and he suddenly realizes that everything is beautiful, that I’m alright and all that. Yep. Yeah, I got to be friends with him..maybe about two years later.

AG: Dave (Amran)?
                                                                   [David Amram]

David Amram:  Yeah, I met Jack first in 1957. I was playing at a place called The Five Spoton Third Avenue between Third Street and the next street down [it was on Eighth Street]. It was a place where the painters and the poets, musicians, everyone used to come in New York City at that time. I brought Cecil Taylor down in the Fall of 1956 and all the painters loved his music. He played there five weeks, January 3rd, I began playing there. After about the fifth or sixth week, sometime around that time, Jack came in. I think I’d seen him (I’d heard about him from other people over the years. (but) we’d never met). And when you’re playing in a place, especially what would be considered to be a rugged environment, usually part of the way that you learn how to survive each night is to try  to be aware on some kind of a psychic level, of who’s there, whether you make eye contact with them (which sometimes could be dangerous) or whether you just feel. Mostly you look and feel for somebody who’s listening. If there’s one person listening.. (because there was no microphone then, and most of the people that you’ve heard of, fantissimo rappers here at this festival, were all there in force. So there might be two hundred people having a hundred and eighty conversations, drawing pictures, painting, while the music was going on, We were the foreground and the background, the music was just part of the whole happening. But I could feel Jack’s presence, and I looked over and I saw this guy sitting there, listening. I said “wow! man, I got one person listening tonight”. I never forgot him. A few months later, I was at my place on Chrisopher Street (Ruthie [sic] is here who works at the school, she can tell you she helped me move from there, the Lower East Side between Avenue B and C, on two trips in her Volkswagen, I had all my earthly belongings. Less is definitely more if you have to climb six-and-a-half flights of stairs two times to move to a five-flight walk-up, which was a big step upward at that time - 114 Christopher Street. HowardHart, who was a fine drummer and a struggling poet came over withPhilip Lamantiaand Jack to my place because they wanted to do some jazz poetry readings. 
Jack came up and Howard sat down and started playing drums on the table with his hands, Philip read some of his fantastic poetry and then Jack started reading and I was playing the piano behind him. We didn’t say anything, but, in backing him up, he was so musical, so sensitive to the music, that it was just like playing with a great saxophone player or great musician. Even tho’ we had the material, the way he interpreted it, and the way he timed it, was like a true musician. After about the third poem that we were messing around with then I took out the French horn and started playing that, and at the end of one of the poems he started improvising and scat-singing and making up melodies [Amram mimics Kerouac’s scat singing]– I said “Wow!”  Here’s a man from the literary world that can sing!  So after we had our.. that was our only jazz-poetry rehearsal we ever had, about forty-five minutes. Then we hung out for about three hours. I found out that he still spoke French. We were rapping away in French. He started talking about (Louis Ferdinand) Celineand (Charles)Baudelaire. He asked me how come I knew French and I had been a gym teacher at the Marie Reed School in Washington DC 1951 to (19)52, and we found out, through mutual interest in sports, connecting French language,  (Louis Ferdinand) Celine, (Charles) Baudelaire (and) baseball, he began to tell me about his baseball games and all the way he had his little league and teams and games that he made. I’d never read anything by him but I was so impressed by the expanse of his mind and by his kindness that we started walking down the street  towards MacDougal Street. (We said) “”let’s go and hang out on Christopher Street to go to Bleecker Street and MacDougal Street and see what was happening (because there was always something, twenty-four-hours-a-day on the street happening). And we were walking and didn’t say anything for about half an hour and suddenly he turned and he said, “Sometimes”, he said, “you know, you meet somebody and you feel you’ve known them forever”. And that was exactly the same feeling that I had had with him but I never would have been able to articulate it that way. We continued walking around and finally when we  got to MacDougal Street, which is about two blocks long, there were a lot of lights, bright lights over on one side where they have all these little dinky shops, and on the left hand side , where they hadthe Gaslight, the Kettle of Fish, all these great places where people would get together and hang out , it was very dark by then.And I said, “Well, man, let’s go on the sunny side of the street”. And he said, “No”, he said, “this side”. I said, ”How come?”. And he said, “Because a writer should always be a shadow”. That was something that I never forgot and that’s why I think he was such a beautiful observer, such a beautiful person to be with, such a sympathetic, modest, humble, warm, giving, caring and sharing person, because he always saw himself as being part of the situation, and even when he became so well-known later on, he never would barge in and take over . He would go to the most insecure person in the room and consciously go to hang out with them, and if anybody was a writer, poet, painter, musician, carpenter, plumber whatever, he’d try to find out what they were doing, and encourage them to feel good. And ever since that time, up until a few months before he passed, I would always see him when he came to New York City and very often talk to him on the phone . (I) feel blessed to have known him, and I’d just like to say one tiny thing – that the last two days I’ve been here [at the Kerouac celebration] I’ve seen and felt more attention and respect and love for his work than I think he ever had in his own lifetime and I think that that’s a beautiful beautiful thing, especially for all you people who came here, if you’re writers, whatever you do, to know that if you have one person listening, one person reading it, you have the beginning of your audience and the rest of your life you can write even for that one person, and eventually, if you keep on and are true to what you believe and what you feel,  and keep developing, then it will never stop. And Jack’s flame is very much alive, and I think a major thing about it is that all of us are able to be here  and that what he did is really just beginning to be appreciated, and, twenty-some years later , to see that happen is a very beautiful and moving and rejoicing experience.

Edie Parker Kerouac: Allen, can I tell you how he learned how to scat?
AG: Yes
Edie Parker Kerouac: Do you remember Seymour Wyse?
AG: Yes, sure
Edie Parker Kerouac: Seymour Wyse was from Liverpool, England
AG: A Liverpool Jew
Edie Parker Kerouac: Yeah and he used to scat, and he and Jack used to do this together. And the first time, it was terrific. They’d get one side of the street, Seymour, and he’d get on the other, and they’d walk down the street, and everybody would listen, it was beautiful. And then, the first time that Jack ever smoked pot , we went from the Village Vanguard at about four in the morning with Lester Young to Minton’s  (Playhouse) and he gave Jack pot for the first time  
AG: How did you know it was the first time?
Edie Parker Kerouac: Oh yeah, he told me so because he said so
AG: Who gave it to him?
Edie Parker Kerouc: Lester Young
John Clellon Holmes: Lester Young
AG: Quite a transmission!  - Well that’s a new fact.

                                                                  [Lester Young] 

AG: (William) Burroughsis probably not here. Is Herbert Huncke here perchance?..or Carl Solomon? – is Carl here?
GC: (Michael) McClure just came in – and is Jan Kerouachere?
AG: Is Jan Kerouac here?
Gregory Corso: Michael (McClure)’s here
AG: So Michael would, chronologically, probably be, no, I think my brother Eugene would be next, because he met him in (19)45
Gregory Corso: Yes. Eugene
AG: Eugene, are you here? – Yes – could you step up for a moment please
Gregory Corso: And Michael, when did you first meet Jack?
Michael McClure: Me?
Gregory Corso: Yeah
Michael McClure: October of (19)55
Gregory Corso: There you go

AG: Okay, so, then,  we’re doing it chronologically, so (Eu)gene, could you come here..
Edie Parker Kerouac; Allen? shall I get down?
AG: For a moment
Edie Parker Kerouac: That's great, listen, I'm tired 
AG: No I’ll get down
Edie Parker Kerouac: No, no
GC:  Up here I’ll be the transitory chair.
AG: Yeah..    So, let’s see now, Eugene Brooks, my brother, (also a poet), now when did you..when did you run into Jack, I think real early? - first, first hit?


                     [Allen Ginsberg and his brother, Eugene Brooks, 1944 - Photo c The Allen Gnsberg Estate]


                                                            [Eugene Brooks (Eugene Ginsberg)]

Eugene Brooks(Eugene Ginsberg): I had been in the army from nineteen till.. till nineteen forty-five, 1942-45,  and that would be about October, and I came to visit Allen, and I think it was in the West End Bar when Allen introduced me to Jack, What I remember at the time was mostly his smile, sort of a modest smile and I don’t remember any of the conversation at that time. My recollections of him were fragmentary but I had visited this great apartment on 118th Street earlier in 1944 I had gotten a clipping from my father which told me all aboutthe Lucien Carr-(David) Kammerer thingand here I..then I suddenly stepped into this apartment, there was (William) Burroughs talking about different kinds of narcotics,Joan Vollmer, who was very pretty, Allen, Lucien, and Kerouac would come in and out. Subsequently over the years I saw him once or twice. I got married (my wife Connie’s up there) in 1954 in December, and Kerouac.. Allen came in from California for the wedding and Kerouac, apparently, was in town, and I think the day after we took a trip downtown and around Columbia University because I was living at 105thStreet. He took some movies of us which I still have.

AG: Jack did?

Eugene Brooks: Yes, Jack took some movies of us cavorting, you know, after we were married, we were kidding around, sitting at a park bench. I went into some pantomime trying to pick my wife up, you know! – In 1955, he had grown a little.. he had moved to ..well, he was not moved to Northport yet but he had some problem with..Joan Haverty
(I just want to get the dates straight here) He had met Joan Haverty in 1950 and married her, November 17, rather soon thereafter, wrote On the Road in April (19)51, in May they were separated, in 1952 there were some family court proceedings, in the 1950’s, they continued for some time. Joan did not really want to pursue it  (I have some copies of letters she  wrote to him , in which she indicated, basically, that her poverty compelled her to bring him to court once in a while . So she finally got a lawyer in 1961 and brought a proceeding in the Spring, Court of New York County, to recover monies for necessaries that she had paid for her daughter Jan, who was then I think nine years old, and whom I met in the intervening time, twenty years has passed and she’s thirty years old now. What happened then was that we, after some difficulty persuading Jack to settle the case, we settled it on the terms that he..conceded the paternity (in other words, he acknowledged that Jan was the child – so that”s a final thing, there isn’t any questioning about that

John Clellon Holmes: He acknowledged it to me too.

Gregory Corso: He never did it to me. See, that ‘s a…. 

John Clellon Holmes : Yes, there was a story in Confidential magazine ["My Ex-Husband, Jack Kerouac is an Ingrate"]  with a picture of Jack and a picture of Jan as a child and I took one look at that photograph and I simply… he had been sort of denying it, publicly. And I simply held it up next to his face and looked at both of them and he understood and said..”Ok”

Gregory Corso: Why did he have to doubt? Why was he doubtful?

AG: His mother kept pushing him saying it’s not yours, don’t acknowledge it..

Gregory Corso: the father

AG: Money.. (It was his) mother, I think

Eugene Brooks: It might be interesting, he met Jan twice, once around that time, and then once, I think that was 1957 or (19)58  when she visited him when she was on the road herself. When Jan met him in 1961, Joan (she went back to her mother and told her what had happened, and her mother, subsequently, about a month later, wrote to Jack, saying, “I wasn’t afraid of anything you might have said to her or in front  of her, Tuesday, because this kid just bounces back like a rubber ball. She’s virtually uncrushable. But what a new cocksure step she’s cut now that she’s met you and the old spontaneous belly-laugh is back. I haven’t heard it since she was about three or four” – That’s about it

Gregory Corso: We can take a quick question (before we) get Michael McClure
AG: Quick question because we’d like to bring up Michael McClure next 
[Audience-member] - (You mentioned about Lucien..  ?)     
AG: About the what?
Eugene Brooks: Lucien..
Gregory Corso: The Lucien Carr thing, the letter..the..



Eugene Brook: The Kammerer thing? No, I’m not talking about the letter. What I’m talking about is the New York Times. My recollection is that it was the New York Times, on the front page, (or maybe my recollection’s incorrect there), detailing the fact that there was this murder on Morningside Heights, and that Lucien Carr had been arrested, and that my brother was held as a material witness, (and Jack, of course, had been held as a material witness too, and had to get out on bond, and I think that was the point at which he married Edie Parker)
[Audience-member] (Where is Lucien now?)
AG: He’s working in the office in New York, with his kids - I think Michael McClure is here?  - Yeah - [to Michael McClure) want a little step up?
Gregory Corso: (I'll get a) glass of water (water for Michael McClure) (aqua)


                                                                [Michael McClure]

AG: So the questions were..what we were doing was going on a round of where.. what was your first hit on Kerouac.. first time you met? That was the thing that each one of us was trying to recall as accurately as possible.

Michael McClure: Well, that’s easy enough for me. I remember that very well.

AG: Also, what year and everything?

Michael McClure: That would be.. well, I think.. Allen had told me. We’re talking about ..first time I saw Jack was October 1955. I met Allen earlier that year, (or late in (19)54, I forget which), we met at a party for W.H.Auden after a reading that Auden had given at The Poetry Center in San Francisco.Ruth Witt-Diamant who was the director of The Poetry Center had a party and Allen and I met each other there, and then as I got to know Allen, he talked to me about Jack, he showed me letters from.. and I think I remember (is this a true memory, Allen?)  that you showed me parts of Mexico City Blues?

AG: Yeah. Around (19)55

Micheal McClure: Yeah. ok. Because I remember the first time I saw Mexico City Blues I liked it a lot and then, when at the Six Gallery reading in San Francisco, when Allen first read "Howl", that was the first time I saw Jack, because Jack was in the audience, and I don’t really think I had a hit on Jack then because I was a little stunned by “Howl” and by what we were doing. A couple of days later, or maybe the next day, Allen brought Jack over to our place, Joanne (McClure) and I were living on Sacramento Street in San Francisco in an apartment that used to belong to the painter Harry Jacobus. And he’d gone to Majorca with Jess Collinsand Robert Duncan and we’d taken over that apartment, and so it was a nice.. nice place. Allen and Jack came over and they had a matchbox full of grass, and I remember my thought about Jack was “this is the first time in my life I ever met anybody that was maybe more self-conscious than I was”. Because my memory of it is, you know, like, in high school.. when I walked across the high-school auditorium in high school, I could feel my neck creak as I walked (it went crack, crack crack, like that), I was that self-conscious, and just to see Jack walk across the room wth just Joanne and Allen and I, I could see his neck creaking. And also he was very handsome at that time.I was impressed, you know, like, with, with his good looks. He was (a) slender, almost kind of movie-star-ish, masculine guy, with a lot of grace to his movements and that kind of self-consciousness that goes with it. I remember I was talking to somebody about this the other day and they said.. it was Henry Allen..they said, “Oh you mean shy” and I said, “No, I don’t mean shy:. We talked about..  and Henry and I talked about that for a minute and I said “”Shy” is where you can live with being shy, you're just shy. “self-conscious” is where you know you’re self-conscious but you’ve got to stand up and do all those things anyway, as if you weren’t.

AG: You remember the first conversation… any first conversation? or earliest conversation you can remember? or any, any flash?

Michael McClure: Well I.. always something that has served as an example for me in the sense of Jack. Well, yeah, I have a.. I mean.. like favorite memories of Jack are watching him read the sound poem at the end of Big Sur,sitting there outside of Lawrence (Ferlinghetti)’s cabin on the coast of California, in the darkness of night with the clouds drifting by and he sat down by the ocean on the point of the land where he had sat. He wrote a long poem what the ocean said   This poem ends his novel Big Sur and it goes like..
(Michael McClure approximates Kerouac's classic  sound poem - "Kssh lssh shrr shloosh  laboobish shlaa cra nash boo ka-bom-pa sza-la merchna missy blue mist green star shlaboosh –ch-ch-ch-ch – sh-bong wah wah!") - ["..arrac'h--arrache--/Kamarc'h Jevac'h--/Tamana----gavow--/Va--Voovla--Via--/Mia--mine---/sea/poo.."] - 
And he took this from.. Jack's little letters from Ferlinghetti’s cabin, down to the point of land where he sat writing that poem and read that poem, at night, with the mist drifting over him and the stars seen occasionally through that. I mean, that’s a wonderful memory. Also at that same time, I remember Jack giving for what has always been for me a kind of example that I refer back to maybe once a day for all the rest of my life, for maybe sometimes more than once a day and that is we were all sitting around doing what we used to like to do in those days – somebody would say, “I read this” – “I just read Mickey Spillane’s new novel”, somebody said “Oh yeah but I read Albert Camus' book of essays” and somebody would say, “Oh yeah, man, but I read David Copperfield” and somebody would say,”oh yeah man, but I read this” – And Jack would say, we’d done that for a while and Jack would say,”Well, you’re just, you’re masturbating, that’s just some kind of intellectual masturbation, because you’re not giving any point of information, you’re just moving it one up constantly”, He said “Why don’t you say, if you’re going to say you read something, why don’t you give a perception about it”, he said. Like, for instance, “I just read, or recently read, a novel by a nineteenth-century novelist named Herman Melville which was about a one-legged sea-captain who was having a war with a great white whale who represented the cosmos, and it seemed to me that the central issue of this novel was Captain Ahab saying at one point (that) we must strike through the mask of evil. Therefore it occurred to me that Melville saw evil as white in the form of this great black whale – and he had this other man who was a protagonist”. And he said, “That way you give some information about it. 

AG: Was that actually his take?

Michael McClure What?

AG: Was it his actual take on Melville or were you improvising his take?

Michael McClure: I’m sort of improvising as I go. I think it was Melville he spoke of (but) I don’t even remember specifically what the book is. I remember the tone of his conversation, and whenever I hear myself saying (or not whenever, but oftentimes when I hear myself saying) those..those little hierarchical, or those little masturbational things, I say “oops, I better say something about it if I’m going to do that, otherwise I’m indulging in a kind of hierarchical grooming going on here". And that’s always been an exemplary lesson for me. It.. how long should I go on here?.. I… Another exemplary thing comes, not from anything Jack said but, from his novels themselves, because I see Jack as being a kind of athlete and master of the sensorium, of sensorium, of sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell. For instance, when I would read something of Jack’s that I’d oftentimes very strongly disagreed with his point of view on, what he saw and what he gives me, is the gift of the way he saw it, not some vague repetition that I can align my sensibilities with but a very clear, very sharp-edged, perception of what he saw. So he’s giving me something. So I guess I’m saying the same thing, in both instances. In Jack’s work he’s saying, you give your perceptions and, in this incident that took place in Lawrence (Ferlinghetti)’s cabin, he’s saying, you should give your perception with your statement about it.

Gregory Corso: Right, now Nanda [to Fernanda Pivano] – you would be the next shot…excuse me, the Italian connection – Thanks Michael.

AG: Ray isn’t in the house? Ray Bremser?  Is Ray Bremser around? or Diane DiPrima?
GC:  or who? Carolyn (Cassady), yes, she is important. Where is she? Is Carolyn here?
AG: Or Carl Solomon)?  or (Herbert) Huncke ok?

                                            [Fernanda Pivano and Jack Kerouac]

Fernanda Pivano: So..the first time I heard about Kerouac was when On the Roadwas published. Hannah Josephson was the librarian of the Academy of Arts and Letters took me a copy to Italy, she was a friend of Malcolm Cowley and Malcolm Cowley had given her the copy to read on the ship. So she gave me the book. At that time I was the advisor of an Italian publisher. She gave me the book and she said. “And soon we're going to do something out of it"  And so I had the book published by that publisher and I started corresponding with Kerouac. The correspondence was mostly for professional reasons, about his books, about the characters in The Dharma Bums, then when The Subterrraneans was seized [sic] I had to ask him to write letters for the Italian judge and so on. Then, when the Italian publisher  published the fifteenth no five hundredth book of a prestigious series called the Medusa, they used Big Sur for that volume, and they gave Kerouac a thousand dollars to come to Italy to celebrate the anniversary, and Kerouac came. And so this is when I first met him (except that when he arrived, he was drunk, desperately drunk, because someone on the plane had told me he was making passes at the hostess and so someone told him“don’t make an ass of yourself “, and this made him furious, humiliated him, and so he started drinking, and when he arrived in Milano he was so drunk that he even lost his suitcase!)  And so, when he was taken to an hotel (Allen knows the hotel because he has been there himself) someone gave him a morphine shot, and at that moment he called me, and he shouted at the telephone desperately that he wanted to go back home right away, to go and rescue him so he could go home again, that he would give back the thousand dollars, he didn’t want to stay in the country where they were giving him shots of poisons, (his paranoia was exchanging morphine for poison). And so his disasterous trip in Italy started that way. He came to the television, I had to interview him for the television. He tried to recuperate somehow some energy and so he was very arrogant, he didn’t answer the questions, it was very difficult. And then he went to the press conference and he didn’t say a word, and then he went to a party and he stayed all the evening just drinking without speaking with anyone.



The publisher was very resentful. And then they took him to Rome and in Rome they made another interview, the television, because they were hoping that the second interview would be more more responsible,  but instead he was there on the stage under a flood of spotlights, very sad, very desperate, defeated, completely defeated. And all the establishment, all the literary critics of the establishment were around, all well-dressed, you know, with the grey suits and so on, and he was wearing his lumber-man’s shirt and his proletarian shoes andthey were looking at him like a wounded lion. He was a wounded lion but he was a lion, and the other ones were just.. creeps.  And then he was taken to a night-club. Imagine! Jack in a night-club – in an Italian night-club!  - and so, there was a girl there and, completely drunk as he was, he tried to make a pass at her, but she didn’t realize who he was, so she was just disgusted because he was drunk, she didn’t want to have to do with him. So he was frustrated and he was taken back to his hotel and he called me and he spent two hours on the telephone, and in that conversation by telephone he told me about this book, mostly of his mother of course, how desperate he was, (because his mother had just had a stroke, the day before he left, and so he didn’t know what to do with her, he had not yet solved the problem of how to attend to her). And so he kept saying, “I came because I had to pay the rent for my mother’s house” and then he spoke of Thackeray (William Makepeace Thackeray) and about how Thackeray had been a postman - [Editorial note - is this true?]  - And so he said “Maybe I will be a postman” – and I (said I) don’t believe it. And, and so on. And then he talked very much about San Giovanni de la Croce (St John of the Cross), which was one of his beloved characters (as well as Gregory (Corso)’s – I remember Gregory speaking of San Giovanni de la Croce) - And now I don’t want to tell you what he said exactly in two hours telephone call. (but) (And) then, next day, he went to Naples, but in Naples he couldn’t even walk, he was just carried around, like that, like a suitcase - And this was my encounter with Kerouac.

GC: What year was that?

Fernanda Pivano: This was in (19)66, Gregory. He died three years later. He was still very handsome but somehow.. inflated..how do you say”

John Clellon Holmes  & Allen Ginsberg: Bloated

Fernanda Pivano:  Swollen, swollen, swollen, somehow swollen in his face, but his eyes were still beautiful, his voice was still beautiful. When he was in Milano, I took him to my house and he came onto my terrace and there he was calm and he could talk a little, then he talked of (Allen) Ginsberg, of course, and of Gregory and of his friends, and ofHenry Cru (because I had met Henry Cru, a year earlier) . He was quiet and he wanted to drink but I didn’t want to let him drink so  I just gave him a glass with a drop of whisky so h smelled it and it was enough for him to to..quiet down. He..he was an extraordinary person and the fact that he was drunk didn’t mean much. It was just bad for him, not for us.

John Clellon Holmes : That’s great.

Gregory Corso: Okay is there anybody here who knew him, let’s say..
AG: Oh Ann Charters.. 
Gregory Corso: Oh Ann Charters knew him? ..alright.. 
AG: Jan Kerouac is not here is she?  or is she?  Jan? 
Gregory Corso: No, I asked for her a few minutes ago
AG:  Ok. If anybody sees Carl (Solomon) or (Herbert) Huncke or anyone like..  that knew him.   
Gregory Corso: What year?



Ann Charters: Well, I could talk about Kerouac in 1956 at Berkeley at the second reading of "Howl"
AG: Right, right
Ann Charters: But I’d rather, because we’re running out of time and I think there are other (things to do)
AG:  First hit, the idea was the first hit, first conversation, any first recollection..

Ann Charters: Well I was with Peter (Orlovsky) and I was mostly interested in Peter. I was also interested in someone else who was there..my husband-to-be, but he was with some other person, and, you know, it was the typical confusions of being nineteen and away at school. But I was with Peter and I really always was fascinated with Peter. For me Peter was the best-looking person in that room. And I know Jack was vibrant, Jack was vibrant and he was exciting, and he was in a way mobilizing the crowd, even before the poetry began to get rolling, because of, you know, drinking, passing the wine and collecting for it (he was organizing the party in his little way too).  But I didn’t say anything to him then, I was just impressed with his vitality and with Allen’s poem, “Howl”  and with Peter, you know. Okay  - but the important thing to put on record - and why I came down - is because something – to follow up something Nanda said about 1966 - which is, when I went to see Kerouac in Hyannis. (he didn’t remember me at the "Howl" reading, or at Ginsberg’s party eating spaghetti even before that, it was ten years previous and there’d been a lot of girls and a lot of wine) – but – now, here’s the thing – he had suffered, among other reasons, the neglect of any literary recognition and I was doing a bibliography – I, a PhD from Columbia, you know, a young woman, who he regarded as a gentle woman, and a scholar. So he allowed me to come in, and he was very very helpful and very very considerate – he answered my questions about how he wrote the books, he allowed me to take twelve shots with my Rolloflex (camera) . He wouldn’t record our conversations, he had... you know, he was a little careful and kind of paranoid about that, but he would have been a vastly different person if more readers during his time, literary critics, especially the literary establishment, had taken him more seriously as an artist and as a writer. And why I came down was to continue this thought, That’s what Nanda was saying about being a postman, you know. Like nobody was taking him seriously and he needed to make money to support his mother, which was an obligation he took extremely seriously, and she was his best friend. (I mean. let’s face it, she kept that house for him and she kept it all going.) 
Well, she cooked dinner for me the night that I was there, We worked all day on the books and she cooked dinner, and Jack said  (Jack was drinking Johnny Walker Red and beer and he said), “This isn’t any good for dinner”, he said, “My mother has a great chicken pie. Why don’t we go out and get a little wine at the liquor store?". So I agreed to go with him, you know, to get away from the house and let his his mother finish the dinner – I also had an Irish setter, and  Jack, very considerately, said, “Why don’t we take the setter to the beach? (this was in Hyannis). So we got in my little Volkswagon car, and I’m driving. and the dog’s in the back, and Jack’s sitting, you know, and he palmed a beer-can so skillfully out of the house (because his mother was screeching at him not to take anymore out. “You know, Jack, you shouldn’t drink on the streets”). Well, he had it, right up there, you know, he was.. really neat..I was really impressed with that!.  So he said, "Before we go to the liquor store, you know, we’ll go to the beach for the dog," 
We did that for a while. We sat on the rocks and talked, and he talked a little about Vietnam and Korea and the whole thing about war, and he was.. he  was definitely proud of being masculine and proud of being a marine and fighting for his country and that sort of thing. And I was mostly keeping the dog in check. And then he said, “Before we go to the liquor store, let me take you to a bar”, you see. So I (thought), “ God!, sure, I’m on the road with Jack Kerouac!” - > I was so proud, you know. And he takes me to the bar and he continues, of course, he has another shot of scotch - and I had one too. And we listened to the juke-box and it comes on the tune Exactly Like You– and he says :That reminds me of my first wife”, you know. Now, I have my little notebook and I’m writing all these things down, and drinking my scotch, listening, watching him, and he's just incredible. And then we go to the liquor store - and here’s the point, he says “My mother just wanted me to buy wine, but I think I want to buy champagne”, he said, “because this is a very special dinner because what you’re doing for me is a very special job, with the bibliography”. So we bought some domestic champagne, (and)  took it home. His mother said, “Oh Jack, you shouldn’t have”, you know, and he said, "Well I’ve also bought this for you, mother”, he said, “because I know you’ll drink it” (it was the only thing she drank, she considered champagne healthy and everything else made you sick! – a wise woman, in her way, you know!)/  And so...and so in that kitchen we opened the champagne and Mamere and I drank it and he continued with his scotch (and didn’t eat anything!) – But the point is that he really did have a sense, even if he was at the end of his life, of celebration, which existed in his life as much as it shall exist for eternity in his work.

Gregory Corso:  Is Al Aronowitzhere?    

The final part of this discussion (question and answers, with the active participation of the audience), will be serialized next week

[Audio for the above can be heard here, beginning at approximately twenty-seven-and-a-quarter minutes in and concluding at approximately seventy-and-three-quarter minutes in]    

[A version of this text appeared in Beats at Naropa - An Anthology  (edited by Anne Waldman and Laura Wright, Coffee House Press, 2009]
        

Jack Kerouac - The Northport Tapes

$
0
0


Audio of Jack Kerouac is priceless and so we're very happy to feature this weekend (courtesy of Counter Culture Chronicles and the remarkable Ubu Web) - "The Northport Tapes"

As Ubu Web notes:
"Counter Culture Chronicles has released on cassette a rare recording of Jack Kerouac at home in Northport, (Long Island), where he lived from 1958 to 1964. We hear Kerouac reading from his work while getting drunk and occasionally singing along with Frank Sinatra records that are being played in the background. Kerouac is clearly having a good time and takes the listener on a lucid deconstructionist trip, in which American popular culture is turned upside down and inside out. The recording covers the full ninety minutes the material. Have a seat and get filled to the brim with Kerouac's intoxicated mind. You won't get up again." 




Side A of "The Northport Tapes" can be heard here

& Side B can be heard here  
















Jack's Last Call - Say Goodbye to Kerouacwritten by Patrick Fenton and directed by Sue Zizza, with music by David Amram, a dramatization based on these tapes may be listened to here

George  Wallace's account of Jack Kerouac in Northport, in Polaritymagazine, can be read here  - and his video - a tour of Kerouac's Northport -  can be viewed here
(Fenton's tour of Kerouac's Queens, incidentally can be accessed here) 

Here's further background (from Christopher Twarowski  & Spencer Rumsey) in the local paper - Jack Kerouac - The Long Island Years




Meditation and Poetics - 58 - (Whitman 1)

$
0
0



AG:  So to Walt Whitman  “When I Read The Book” – so this is some statement of his opening.. (I’m reading from Whitman now, from the Modern Library (edition) of Leaves of Grass, page (twenty) eight – “When I read the book, the biography famous/ And is this, then, (said I), what the author calls a man’s life?/ And so will some one, when I am dead and gone, write my life?/ (As if any man really knew aught of my life;/ Why, even I myself, I often think, know little or nothing of my real life;/Only a few hints – a few diffused, faint clues and indirections,/I seek, for my own use, to trace out here.) 
Well, now, I’m choosing this as a little progression from (William Carlos) Williams’ clear seeing detail. He’s working with ordinary mind, also, Whitman. He’s willing to accept he doesn’t know anything about his own life – that emptiness. That’s his version of sunyata – in relation to his own ego, his own nature, his own solidification, and yet, at the same time, what can you work with but the few hints, few solid thoughts, few direct perceptions. So he’s starting, beginning where I am, with the unborn, so to speak, with the unborn mystery of my own life (unborn, in the sense that you can’t trace its roots, not that it isn’t there, just that you don’t know where it began – like the universe).
“Only a few hints – a few diffused, faint clues..” – So it’s like Williams saying, “I’m settling for the raw material. No, I’m not interested in the finished product . It’s only in “isolate flecks” that something is given off” – some little flashes of perception, some few moments of direct clarity - (being) willing to work with those moments, without bullshit. Then, the moments of non-aggressive, non-bullshit, non-assertive, direct, clear seeing. So that’s, in a sense, Whitman’s ambition
And then, somewhat like the imperturbable nature of mind observing its own projections but never entangled in them,, if you have the advantage of meditative practice – these (are) among Whitman’s salutations to the reader and introductions to the reader toward his state of mind – “Me Imperturbe” – (I-M-P-E-R-T-U-R-B-E, or “Me Imperturb” - but I imagine it’s some Europeanism – “Me Imperturbe” (Mee Impurturbee)  - “Me Imperturbe, standing at ease in Nature/ Master of all, or mistress of all – aplomb in the midst of irrational things,/ Imbued as they – passive , receptive, silent as they/ Finding my occupation, poverty, notoriety, foibles, crimes, less important than I thought/ Me toward the Mexican Sea or in the Mannahatta, or the Tennessee, or far north or inland,/ A river man, or a man of the woods,or of any farm-life in These States, or of the coast, or the lakes, or Kanada”  - [K-A-N-A-D-A] – “Me,  wherever life is lived, O to be self-balanced for contingencies !/ O to confront night, storms, hunger, ridicule, accidents, rebuffs, as the trees and animals do.” – Well, he’s pointing to a quality of imperturbable mind, or imperturbable self-nature, which, by now, in this course, or some course, I hope we have begun to develop as part of our own mind, part of our own open nature. So that’s somewhat, you might say, the Mahayana core of the fellow.

And then for a bodhisattva statement, the famous one – “Poets To Come” – “Poets to come!, orators, singers, musicians to come!/ Not to-day is to justify me, and answer what I am for/But you, a new brood, native, athletic, continental, greater than before known/ Arouse! Arouse – for you must justify me – you must answer./ I myself but write one or two indicative words for the future,/ I but advance a moment, only to wheel and hurry back into the darkness/ I am a man who, sauntering along, without fully stopping, turns a casual look upon you/ and then averts his face,/ Leaving it to you to prove and define it/ Expecting the main things from you.”

So that’s precisely what we’re about right at this moment – (in the position) of approving and defining” his hints, scientifically, and with a full experience of a hundred years of apocalyptic history, examining the nature of his tolerance, mellowness, open mind, negative capability, empathy and spaciousness, - where it comes from, how we can attain it, how is it characteristic of all poetry? and how it's a characteristic of  human mind - using, in this case, the definitions of meditation. 

[Audio for the above may be heard here, starting at approximately fifty-and-a-quarter minutes in and concluding at approximately fifty-five-and-three-quarter minutes in] 

Meditation and Poetics - 59 (Whitman 2)

$
0
0




















[Walt Whitman (1819-1892) and William Wordsworth (1770-1850)]

AG: So (to) get right into “Song of Myself”, and I’ll do as much of it as we can (in an hour) So he [Walt Whitman] begins -  as we had in (William Carlos) Williams  [in Danse Russe’] - “Who shall say I’m not the happy genius of my household”, (which was really an extension of  a kind of Whitmanic empathy) . So on that common ground, Whitman begins, “I...” -  (this is page twenty-three of the Modern Library version, or whatever page you have of whatever Whitman you got) - ”Song of Myself” – “I celebrate... -  I celebrate - what? Well, he doesn’t know what to celebrate. It’s all too slippery, so the only thing he can rely on is his own nature (which is somewhat like the theory of Objectivism that I was talking about – that those elements of our own consciousness that we observe objectively are like the furniture around the room, are some solid objects which can be celebrated or dealt with in poetry), and he’s sufficiently..  See, there’s always that little ambiguity in Whitman - Is this self a solidification of ego? - or is this self some kind of porous balloon-like empty cloudy thing that, actually, is (something) he’s wittily aware of as a sort of general idea or a notion ?  - Or is it some universal self that everybody partakes in (is he pointing out to some big LSD great mind?) or, what is he pointing out to? what is the self? So he’s going to determine, he’s going to examine it, and its going to turn out to be..,what? - I don’t know, we’ll find out. It’s a “song of my self [sic]” (which is a little tricky area to step on, into - you know - it freaked out everybody at the time) because..except, for the beginning of the tradition of (William) Wordsworth  (who, amazingly, began to write an epic just about his own mind, the progress of his own mind, instead of epic universal history or Iliad battles or Odyssean travels  or Heaven-Hell-Paradise).. Wordsworth, strangely enough, modernized poetry to begin to deal with here and now, the person and the self, in his long epic poems, The Prelude and “The Excursion (I was thinking the other day, I don’t think I said that here - that really was an enormous breakthrough that Wordsworth did, because before him there was no other great poet that wrote vast epic poems about what the poet actually knew, (which was only his own self and his own world). A poet could write about book-learning and he could write about mythological experience, but rarely did a poet ever write about his own experience directly, without attempting to nobilitate it, to elevate it to mythological (status) or disguise it.  Generally… pardon me?

Student:  (What about Wordsworth's other poems?)

AG: Well there are the great.. well, all of his longer shorter poems like “..Intimations of Immortality and “..Tintern Abbey are about his own experience, but he also wrote long poems – “The Excursion” and “The Prelude” – long autobiographical poems, actually, sub-titled, I think, “On the Growth of the Poet’s Mind”, [editorial note - "Growth of A Poet's Mind - An Autobiography"] actually ...So that it was actually Wordsworth who made things real, in the sense of made things personal, real in the sense of direct dealing with what the poet could really know of his own life outside of..    tape ends in media res here

[Audio for the above may be heard here, starting at approximately fifty-five-and-a-quarter minutes in and concluding at the end of the tape)

Meditation and Poetics - 60 (Whitman - 3)

$
0
0

































[Walt Whitman ( 1819-1892)]

AG:  So how many here have been listening to (Chogyam) Trungpa’s lectures? How many go? He’s just entered into the Mahayana discourse (and his last lecture was on the paramitas, or excellencies of mind, that were by-products of sitting meditation. The excellencies were generosity, discipline, patience, exertion, concentration and intellect, and I’ll be rummaging through (Walt) Whitman to find examples of generosity, discipline, patience, exertion, concentration and intellect). 

Somebody at the lecture last night asked how do these schematic Mahayana Buddhist virtues differ from anybody’s Whitmanic ordinary mind generosity, discipline, patience, exertion, concentration and wisdom? What’s the difference? His answer was that the Buddhist development was based on egolessness rather than the ambition to buy off the universe by being generous, or feel good by being generous, or by getting credits for being generous (which is a nice distinction, actually. It probably applies).

What I would like to do when we’re going through Whitman is, there is this problem of ego or egolessness in Whitman, which is interesting. I started bringing it up in the end. He extended his sympathy to the farthest corner of the universe. He found himself empathizing with all sentient beings and insentient beings. To what extent was this buying off death, rather than allowing it? To what extent was he trying to create a god of himself, or of man, or of beautiful young men? – an ideal nature that would survive old age, sickness and death, and transport his spirit beyond what might be acceptable natural boundaries – which is ordinary dying. To what extent was this a battle against death? To what extent is his extension of sympathy a plastering or projection of himself onto the entire universe so that he could feel that, if he were dying, at least the universe wasn’t dying and his word, his tone, and his spirit, would survive. And to what extent was that a defect in his wildness?  To what extent did he let go of himself? To what extent was his projection of himself on the entire universe a letting go of himself and to what extent was it a reinforcement of his own truth? Actually, I think it’s mixed. But it’s interesting to read Whitman from that point of view – either as the supreme universal egotist, or as the supreme giver-up and spacious mind.

We’re on Part V of “Song of Myself”. So he begins it with an assertion of his soul – “I believe in you my soul” – (which he’ll define later, I hope ) – “I believe in you my soul, the other I am must not abase you/And you must not be abased to the other./ Loafe with me on the grass, loose the stop from your throat,/ Not words, not music or rhyme I want, not custom or lecture, not even the best/ Only the lull I like, the hum of your valved voice” – 
Well, there’s some evidence there of a loosening. He says actually a loosening and a loafing, so there’s a kind of meditative attitude in that sense. The whole thing is beginning (in) the first section with “loafing”, which, in a sense, was his form of meditation. In the first part, “I loaf and invite my soul” (but he’s loafing to invite his soul, there’s still something that’s going to come from it) .So, “Loafe with me on the grass” – he repeats.

Then, the most tremendous moment in Whitman, in terms of person, in terms of Whitman’s personal family  “I mind how we once lay such a transparent summer morning,/ How you settled your head athwart my hips and gntly turn’d over upon me,/ And parted the shirt from my bosom-bone, and plunged your tongue to my bare-stript heart,/And reach’d till you felt my beard, and reach’d till you held my feet./  Swiftly arose and spread around me the peace and knowledge that pass all the arguments of the earth,/ And I know that the hand of God is the promise of my own,/ And I know that the spirit of God is the brother of my own,/ And that all the men ever born are also my brothers, and the women, my sisters and lovers,/And that a kelson of the creation is love,/And limitless are leaves stiff or drooping in the fields,/And brown ants in the little wells beneath them,/ And mossy scabs of the worm fence, heap’d stone, elder, mullein, and poke-weed.”

Well, it begins with a grand generalization, and ends up in poke-weed. That, I always thought, was sort of the heart of Whitman. It certainly got directly the physical homosexual heart, certainly. Apparently an epiphanous moment when somebody completely accepted him and made love to him, which I think he was probably unused to – on an open field – actually parted his shirt, kissed his heart, and held him from beard to toe – a kind of affirmation of his body and his desire (which to him probably seemed like a cosmic and universal experience), which set his complete body tingling and opened him up for the first time to a fittingness in his own desire, or a realization that his own desire was answerable (which is an experience, I guess, we’ve all had at one time or another, of achieving love that we had despaired of, or of finally getting what we desired). It’s the most epiphanous moment in Whitman, in terms of intense emotional grandeur.

What I liked about it always was that it wound up with the “elder, mullein and poke-weed”, that the cosmic or universal consciousness that was catalyzed by his love experience was manifested in his minute observation of the detail of ““elder, mullein and poke-weed”. He didn’t go off into a cadenza about the clouds, he goes off into a cadenza about the worm fence and heaped stones. So that the experience does have the characteristic of existing in a lot of dimensions besides emotional fullness. There is also direct optical perception, or perception, samatha or vipassana perception, minute detail, insight into what’s around him.    

[Audio for the above is available here, beginning at approximately thirty-seconds in
and concluding at approximately eight-and-three-quarter minutes in]   

Jack Kerouac's Birthday

$
0
0


               [Jack Kerouac (1922-1969) - Jack Kerouac in Orlando, Florida, 1958 - Photograph via L.A.Times]

March 12 - It's Jack Kerouac's birthday today. 93 years since his birth in Lowell, Massachusetts, in 1922. We celebrate with some Kerouac news, and some further reading,



Editor Todd Tietchen is interviewed on the Empty Mirror site here on his newLibrary of America edition of three Kerouac novels (Visions of Cody, Visions of Gerard, and Big Sur) and declares: "I am editing another Kerouac volume for them, O Rich and Unbelievable Life!: UnCollected Prose Writings of Jack Kerouac, scheduled for publication in September, 2016. Some highlights of that volume (will) include I Wish I Were You, Memory Babe, the August-November 1951 VA hospital journal, and English translations of  La Nuit est Ma Femme and Sur Le Chemin (translated byJean-Christophe Cloutierof UPenn, who also discovered the manuscript of the lost Claude McKay novel)." 

Interviewer, Paul Maher Jr.'s - The Archive - Sketches on Kerouac - Assorted Ramblings Derived from the Papers of Jack Kerouac is a wonderful trove of (like he says) Kerouac-related matters.























His bibliographic note on the Kerouac Collected Poems is here
His article on the neglected "Strange Cemetery in Jamaica", and on Visions of Cody, along with other articles, are available here.























Kerouac links - here are the links from Jack Kerouac.com at the Jack and Stella Kerouac Center For The Public Humanities 
& How could we forget the Kerouac flame at The Beat Museum
not forgetting too the Jack Kerouac School of Disembodied Poetics...
& The Kerouac Project of Orlando, Florida. Here's another image of Kerouac in Orlando.  Happy Birthday, in memoriam, Jack!  





    

Friday's Weekly Round-Up - 212

$
0
0

 

Recently surfaced, Allen Ginsberg and the Clash - Ghetto Defendant - an extended version which originally appeared on the bootleg "Rat Patrol from Fort Bragg"





[Allen Ginsberg with Mick Jones, and withJoe Strummer, of  The Clash at Electric Lady Studios in New York, December 1981 at the recording sessions for Combat Rock - Photographs by Bob Gruen]


This coming Monday at the Presentation House Gallery in Vancouver (in conjunction with the on-going Ginsberg photos show), Nude Ghosts, a lecture by Jonathan D Katz

Yet another of Michael Limnios' extraordinary Beat-related interviews - this time Ginsberg biographer, Michael Schumacher:




















Michael Limnios (Blues & Greece): What does "Beat" mean to you?
Michael Schumacher:John Clellon Holmes, the novelist and essayist and close friend of Jack Kerouac, probably gave me the best definition of "beat" I've ever heard. "Beat", he told me "is when you've sunk so low that you're willing to wager all your resources on a single number." This was what Kerouac meant when he first talked about a "Beat Generation" in a conversation he had with Holmes in 1948. Kerouac refined the definition to include "beatific" - angelic in a way. Herbert Huncke, the Times Square hustler Kerouac and Company met and befriended, meant "beat" to mean thoroughly tired and wasted. To answer your question, I suppose, "beat," to me means all of the above. 

For more of Michael's revealing interview, see here

















[Allen Ginsberg and Michael Schumacher (via Michael Schumacher Archives/All Rights Reserved)]



Back in 2012 we featured this classic Corso-subverts-a-Ginsberg reading
- David Kirby re-visits and comments on it - here
- and Andrew Epstein comments on David Kirby's comments - here 

Great news! - our good friend Colin Still and his exemplary, not to say essential, video/production company, Optic Nerve(named in hommage to the great William Blake, incidentally) has a new web-site.  For more information on his continuing on-going energies - see here. 

Here's an example of a classic Optic Nerve video:




Carl Solomon's Birthday

$
0
0


Carl Solomon - dedicatee of"Howl" -  We recently posted a poetry-prose reading by him (from 1982) and see also on the Allen Ginsberg Project our birthday salutes to Carl here and here

Born in the Bronx on March 30 1928, he would have been eighty-seven years old today had he lived - thinking of you, Carl

                         [Carl Solomon - Photograph(s) by Allen Ginsberg  - c, The Estate of Allen Ginsberg]

Meditation and Poetics - (Whitman - 10)

$
0
0
[Allen's August 1978 Naropa lecture on Whitman' s " Song of Myself" continues here]

Then he (Walt Whitman, in “Song of Myself”) goes into a section, in (section) seven, which is more and more close to (William Carlos) Williams sense of accommodating inquisitive mind – [Allen reads from Whitman’s “Song of Myself”] – “Has anybody supposed it lucky to be born?/I hasten to inform him or her it is just as lucky to die, and I know it./I pass death with the dying, and birth with the new-wash’d babe, and am not contain’d between my hat and boots,/And peruse manifold objects, no two alike and every one good,/ The earth good and the stars good, and all their adjuncts all good” – [This is where people began making fun of him, because at this point he’s ideologically extending his acceptancy to a point of what would be called around here “idiot compassion”] – “I am not an earth, nor an adjunct of an earth,/I am the mate and companion of people, all just as immortal and fathomless as myself” – [“fathomless” there would be equivalent to what I was talking about as “unborn”, “unborn” would be “fathomless”, that term – I was using that here, wasn’t I? – “unborn”? – actually, I hadn’t thought of that, but the Western poetic equivalent to the Buddhist term “unborn” would be “fathomless, in the way that Whitman uses it here] – “I am the mate and companion of people, all just as immortal and fathomless as myself/ (they do not know how immortal, but I know)/ Every kind for itself and its own, for me mine male and female/ For me those that have been boys and that love women/For me the man that is proud and feels how it stings to be slighted..” – [Yes] – “For me the sweet-heart and the old maid, for me mothers and the mothers of mothers,/ For me the lips that have smiled, eyes that have shed tears,/For me the children and the begetters of children./ Undrape! you are not guilty to me, nor stale, nor discarded,/ I see through the broadcloth and gingham whether or no/ And am around, tenacious, acquisitive, tireless, and cannot be shaken away” – [And that’s where he gets identical with (William Carlos) Williams’ description of his smell – “(T)enacious, acquisitive, tireless, and cannot be shaken away”. And it’s amazing that this particular quality of mind (the tenacious inquisitiveness, or acquisitiveness), that would be the chief characteristic of the expanding awareness bodhisattva nature as described in traditional Buddhist Mahayana discourse. From unobstructed mind (that is, unprejudiced mind), from unobstructed mind, because there is no obstruction so there is penetration of intellect, or discrimination, or understanding, into every corner of the universe, or every corner of phenomena that’s perceived. So that quality of inquisitiveness then, is what, apparently, I would guess, is the inquisitiveness which is identical with the all-accommodating quality – total curiosity, unprejudiced curiosity (therefore accommodating to any phenomena – in this case the homosexual phenomena). Does that make sense?
So I would say his “soul”, finally, would be that inquisitive, accommodating energy and awareness, which is what his “Person” or “self” is finally related to.  

[Audio for the above can be heard here, beginning at approximately  forty-and-a-quarter minutes in and concluding at approximately forty-four-and-a-quarter minutes in]

Meditation and Poetics - (Whitman - 11)

$
0
0

           [Bathers - (c.1894) - Paul Cezanne (1839-1906) - oil on canvas, 50 cm x 60 cm  -  Musée d'Orsay, Paris], 

[Ginsberg on Whitman continues]


AG: Go on to Section 16 (of Leaves of Grass). Well, yeah, inquisitiveness. In this case a demonstration of it, operating on the erotic level, a projection of Whitman onto a young lady.  [Allen begins reading] – “Twenty-eight young men bathe by the shore…”  - Section 11 – does everybody know that particular Whitman? - “Twenty-eight young men bathe by the shore..” – does anybody not know it? – “Twenty-eight young..” Well, that’s actually the greatest moment in Whitman - the second greatest, fifteenth-greatest, moment. - “Twenty eight young...” I mean,  I’ve been in this moment many times  - Twenty-eight young men bathe by the shore,/Twenty-eight young men and all so friendly,/ Twenty-eight years of womanly life and all so lonesome./ She owns the fine house by the rise of the bank,/She hides handsome and richly drest aft the blinds of the window./ Which of the young men does she like the best?/Ah the homeliest of them is beautiful to her./ Where are you off to, lady? for I see you,/You splash in the water there, yet stay stock still in your room./ Dancing and laughing along the beach came the twenty-ninth bather./The rest did not see her, but she saw them and loved them./ The beards of the young men glisten’d with wet, it ran from their long hair,/Little streams pass’d all over their bodies./ An unseen hand also pass’d over their bodies/It descended tremblingly from their temples and ribs./ The young men float on their backs, their white bellies bulge to the sun, they do/not ask who seizes fast to them./They do not know who puffs and declines with pendant and bending arch,/They do not think who they souse with spray.” – Well, that’s complete empathy there.
So what is empathy, then? In this case, it seems empathizing with a lady spinster looking out of her blinds at naked men bathing on the shore. Obviously, it’s Whitman whose hand is passing tremblingly down their bodies, from their temples and ribs.

[Audio for the above can be heard herebeginning at approximately forty-four-and-a-quarter minutes in, and continuing to approximately forty-six-and-a-half minutes in] 

Anne Waldman's Birthday

$
0
0


Anne Waldman's (70th) birthday today. We direct you to some of our earlier Anne Waldman birthday posts - here, here, here and here

Here is Anne at the Academy of American Poets in 2013, discoursing on "Reading and Writing Long Poems" 


Here's Anne from November last year (with her son, Ambrose Bye) performing at Lake Forest College (in the context of the William Burroughs Centennial). She begins with some comments on Burroughs (including a reading of his "Cold Lost Marbles"), before launching into some selections from her own work, (Gossamurmur, Manatee/Humanity), concluding with the recently-published Jaguar Harmonics, (a text inspired, to a large degree by Burroughs and Allen's seminal Yage Letters)     







                                               [Allen Ginsberg and Anne Waldman, New York City, 1996]
- Happy Birthday, Anne! 

Friday's Weekly Round-Up - 215

$
0
0


Next week (next Tuesday) is  Hal Willner's LA "Howl" extravaganza.

The following day is Earth Day - courtesy WNYC's Spinning on Air, in New York, at The Greene Space there'll be an Earth Day Special with Patti Smith, Anne Waldman,Laurie Anderson and others - A live web-cast of the event will be available here.   

The following day -  Thursday April the 9th - (for all you poètes maudits) isCharles Baudelaire's birthday.

Tomorrow (April the 4th)  Chogyam Trungpa's Parinirvana.



This Sundayat City Lights, Marc Olmsted reads (in honor of Allen's own Parinirvana (April 5th, significantly, one day after Trungpa's).




















Allen's "Wichita Vortex Sutra" - a two-part podcast on the poem on Nine Mile Magazine's "Talk About Poetry", a lively and extended discussion can be heard here and here.

Here's Allen reading his immortal "Howl" on an Evergreen Reviewrecord  (from 1957 - San Francisco Poets). Very pleased to report plans for a new revived (post-Barney RossetEvergreen Review. 

The "Please Master" censorship case. Here's a little clip from last week from the local (Connecticut) tv station, WTNH 



Here's the "op-ed" on April Fools Day from the local newspaper (the Hartford Courant) declaring it up front "an obscene poem" - A what? - What do you think?











Breaking news - from the Beat Museum, just scheduled for 
their June 2015 Beatnik Shindig - Dr. Philip Hicks

"For the first time, Dr. Philip Hicks, psychiatrist to Allen Ginsberg in the mid-1950's will give a talk on the cathartic conversation he shared with a young Allen, which led him to become one of America's most celebrated poets" - "In 1954, Dr Philip Hicks was a young psychiatrist at Langley Porter Clinic (an extension of UC Berkeley Medical School) in session with a young patient, an aspiring businessman. Dr Hicks asked, "What wold you really like to do?". That patient was Allen Ginsberg and that question became a crucial catharsis - the realization that it was okay for him to quit his job & write poetry, that it was okay for him to date men instead of women. This at a time when the American Psychiatry Association still classified homosexuality as a mental disorder. That conversation changed Ginsberg's life, and this (this occasion) will be the very first time Dr Hicks has spoken publicly about it."  

More on the Beatnik Shindig on the Ginsberg Project in the coming months. 

Remembering Jack Kerouac - 3

$
0
0
                                                         [Jack Kerouac 1922-1969]

continuing from last weekend's two posts

Gregory Corso: Al Aronowitz.  Is Al Aronowitz here...Al Aronowitz is not here. okay, well then that’s it, so why don’t you guys rap back and forth. We'll begin with the ones who, originally were on the stage to begin with, and end it.
Paul Jarvis (from the audience): Can I speak about...
Gregory Corso: You can ask a question.
Paul Jarvis: I want to share my experience with (Jack) Kerouac in Lowell.
Gregory Corso: Okay but it’s got to be toute de suite. Come on.
AG: Okay, yes, come on, come on down, but directly, brief and straightforward..
GC:  Brief, man.
AG: ..to the point, on the first meeting.
GC: Right. I only said that, because I’d heard you’d laid it down before and it went on for hours!
Paul Jarvis: I guess…

Gregory Corso: Okay, What year?

Paul Jarvis: I guess chronologically, we just heard up to 1966 and I wanted to share my experience in Lowell, Jack’s home town, my home town, August 27th, 1968. (because a lot has been said about Jack in his later years and his attitude during a time when there was revolution and trouble in Vietnam and I think I have a clear feeling about what he felt in his home-town, Lowell, in 1968). I was in Chicago when the riotsoccurred, I was aVISTA volunteer there, I became disillusioned when the backlash vote took the election and the nomination away from the poet EugeneMcCarthy to Hubert Humphrey and then to Richard Nixon. I returned, knowing I had to seek Jack Kerouac out because I faced the induction physical when I gave up my.. I gave up my deferment. I.. The only person that I’d ever read in American Literature that defied the war machine was Jack Kerouac who wrote in The Town and the City how he threw down his rifle and historically got incarcerated into the Bethesda Psychiatric Hospital from May 20th to June 30th, 1943. I sought out Jack and found him in Cappy's Copper Kettle, a working-class bar in Lowell. I told him who I was. He knew my father, ProfessorCharles Jarvis at the University of Lowell, and he was very kind to me and concerned that I might be inducted into the military and sent to Vietnam. I disagree with this previous marine statement by Mrs Charters

GC: Merchant marines, she meant.

CG: Excuse me?

GC: Merchant marine.

CG: Well, he was in the merchant marine in the most dangerous torpedo runs. He went into the Navy, but he was impounded and put into the psychiatric hospital. But his attitude towards me (and this is what I wanted to share), who was twenty-three years old at the time, very frightened, very anxious to be sent to Vietnam. And he invited me to go home, I drove him home, and he invited me into his home, where I spent a total of eight hours with him, and I was struck by the fact that.. I had heard things that he was a rabid drinker, you know, and possibly a drunk guy, and all this stuff, you know, and (but) he was casually sipping a  few beers. And he listened to me and made me feel very strong about resisting Vietnam, he made the point that all the Vietnam War was about was the American government selling jeeps to both sides!  He then, at that point, (and I felt very honored and blessed and important), said he wanted to introduce me to his mother (and, then - it was three a.m, in the morning at that time - I said, “Well, gosh.. you know”, and he said, "No, no, I want you to meet my mother”. He went and woke her up and brought her into the room and she had a very tranquil peaceful understanding look on her face, and I felt very important, very validated, at a time when people said, “If you don’t like it here, go live in Russia!”. And he said, “Mamere, this is Paul, he’s a real honey lamb”. And I didn’t.. I wasn’t sure what that meant at that time, but I’ve come to find out that it was the ultimate validation for me as a pacifist. And soon thereafter I had my first pre-induction physical and didn’t act against the war, I mean.. I legitimately revolted against the induction physical on three occasions and the third one culminated with (me) seeing a psychiatrist,  and I was judged to be “psychiatrically unfit for military duty”.

I also would like to say that I wish some of this incredible pacifist energy found its way down to the streets of Denver downtown where the resistance is now [1982] going on for another draft and I met Jack again on September 2nd, Labor day, but maybe there’s not enough time to talk about that but I certainly want to share with this audience how kind-hearted and concerned and inspiring Jack Kerouac was in person, as much as his writing was (that I became aware of at the age of sixteen).

GC: Alright. We’re going to close it pretty soon. So if you want to ask any questions, that would be a good shot. And maybe we could volley it back and forth between us five here  Go ahead.

Q: Did Kerouac know Thomas Merton?
AG: Did Kerouac know Thomas Merton?  (is this on?  It is on?) – I think..
Gerald Nicosia: (He admired him), Allen
AG Gerald Nicosia, who is a good biographer.
Gerald Nicosia He (admired Merton’s writings) very much, but he only got to meet him once, in the late (19)50's, when Jack was really drunk, and he was too drunk to really have much of an intelligent exchange with him. But Merton always admired Kerouac's writing and there was a mutual admiration there.
AG: The one person he did know connected with Thomas Merton was Robert Lax, poet from Columbia, and they had a long, long correspondence and had met.
John Clellon Holmes: But their connection with Jack was through Bob..Robert Giroux, his editor, who was a classmate of theirs at Columbia. I’ve heard Jack, I heard Jack talk about Merton quite often and he had great respect for him. I didn’t know, Gerry, that they’d ever met at all
Gerald Nicosia: They were not at Columbia
John Clellon Holmes: No, this was an earlier class
AG: It might have been actually Merton was there in the late (19)30s at Columbia?
Gerald Nicosia: Later.
AG: Early (19)40’s? Because he was there just before I was there as editor of Columbia Review, a couple of years,  and Jack was around then, so they might have met there.
Gregory Corso: Okay

Q: (Of all the.. What was Jack Kerouac look..?)

Gregory Corso: Looking for? Did he find it? I thinkOn the Road gives it pretty clear what he was looking for - his friend, his hero, the archetype American hero, he’s looking for “it”, right? – What was “it”? – They seem to have found it in some mountain in Mexico? ...the little children and all that? giving his depiction of a heavenly state and all that?..

Q:  (I was wondering, more from what you knew)

Gregory Corso: Oh, of what I knew of him? Oh well the Catholicism gave him a shot out, as you know, if you’re really a Catholic, you stick to it and when you're old, you bleed, you’re going to slip through your death like butter and go to heaven – you got it made! His intellectual side took to Buddhist(ic) hit - the no-God.  (Well) – and they seemed to meld pretty well with him.

John Clellon Holmes: Jack, Jack often spoke with me about, particularly after he’d been on the road, or was going on on it again, that what he really wanted was a cabin in New Hampshire, all by himself. He spoke of that many many times. In fact, once he came to Old Saybrook to actually look for a house but it turned into a gigantic binge that lasted ten days and..he never got out of the chair.

Gregory Corso : ..The acceptance, like Ms. Charters mentioned, was.. (that he not get the acceptance) and I think the ego, obviously, was tremendous there for the writer, and he was put down, he was totally put down. He was not accepted by the academy, nor the media, or anything, and that must have hurt the man a lot, (and) so I’m sure maybe that was a shot he was after, and he got it, and it blew him away (alright, that’s really what blew him away)

John Clellon Holmes: And I think you must consider that Jack was a very..was a notorious personality right after On The Road. Many of you may think that that would be an ideal state – to go on television, to have a little money for the first time, but the people who Jack.. whose respect Jack wanted, he didn’t get. The people who trailed after him and climbed over his fence and that, out in Long Island, and bugged him at night on the telephone, were just fans of his (they were like fans of Jimmy Dean, they’d never read the book, that.. so, in a sense, his appeal, his very dynamic personality and his good looks, worked against him.. because he was considered to be kind of the showbiz.. or rather, theMarlon Brando of showbiz.) And this is not what he wanted at all. So he got plenty of recognition but he got no appreciation on the part of people for his literary accomplishment

Gregory Corso:  And it fell back on him,  the Beatnik thing. For instance, if you see a blue whale, imagine you see a blue whale, it doesn’t necessarily make you a blue whale! – but, boy, they gave him that appellation “Beatnik”, it fit on him. He didn’t have the beard did he?, or the bongo drums -   but other than that..

AG: I think, Paul Krassner (has a question)..
Paul Krassner:(...Kerouac was writing a column for a magazine namedEscapadefor a while and then he stopped  shortAnyone know why he stopped?) 
Gregory Corso: It was called “The Last Word” was it?
John Clellon Holmes: The Last Word
Gregory Corso: The magazine just failed, that's all.
AG:  No, I think he had a contract for twelve articles or so (eight or ten or twelve)...
John Clellon Holmes: (I think that it was twelve)
AG: ..and then he did them, he completed them (they have been xeroxed and copies of them are in the Naropa library), and I think it just wasn’t picked up, either because he got sick of doing it.. I think he got sick.. (it wasn’t that well-paid anyway, four hundred (dollars) a column, or something),  and he just got sick of the work of doing them, (and also they probably weren’t that.,they weren’t that inviting, the Escapadepeople), because one was on dharma, ((a) real great serious article on dharma that I read aloud to (Chogyam) Trungpa (Rinpoche) the other night, who was astounded by it, it was so sharp), one on history, one on contemporary poets, one on baseball..
Paul Krassner; And this was a skin magazine.
Gregory Corso:  Skin mag, Yeah.
AG: Escapade
Ann Charters - Allen, Can I answer the question?  I noticed in Kerouac's letters with Sterling Lordthat he accepted a lot of stuff after the fame of On The Road, a lot of writing (commissions), including the Escapade contract, but he was poor then. Well he was interested to begin with, and then, as a writer, he just.. just didn't want it, so he, voluntarily, said, "no more of that".

AG: Yeah, for instance, he had a couple of articles commissioned for Holiday magazine and he couldn’t stand it. So, you know, he just wasn’t interested, so he sat down in my kitchen with Gregory and Peter and myself, and we wrote a couple of them with him.

Gregory Corso: Right – that was good, it was good to make us.. because I had no money at that time, right, I had no money at the time, and he said, “Come on, Gregory, help me with this and I’ll give you half the shot”, and I said, “Great!”

AG: We all concocted a big tour of Green-wich Village and the Lower East Side together for Holiday for holidayers who were coming to New York – where to go in the Bowery for a good meal! – Yes?

(Q: Will your share some of your last interactions (with him and when) ...your last interaction?)

AG: My last interaction I think was on the telephone. He.. as is known, he called up his friends, to the very end, very very late at night, and he was bugging me one night. He called about two in the morning and bugged me by saying - “You dirty Jew..bastard…

Gregory Corso: I was there
John Clellon Holmes: You were?
Gregory Corso: Yeah, I remember

AG: ..The trouble with you, Ginsberg is all you’re trying to do is be famous. You’re sticking your beard into every television set you can and you’re trying to start a war (no reasons for spitefulness bla, boa, bla), and anyway my mother says you’re nothing but a Jew and…"
So I said, “Listen, Jack. If you don’t tell your mother to shut up, I’ll throw some shit up her cunt and make her eat it!"

Gregory Corso: Right right right, that was big, yeah, I remember that.

AG: And at that point, he started laughing.

John Clellon Holmes: He started laughing

AG: At that point I started laughing. I realized for twenty years, he had been bating me, waiting for me to have a sense of humor!

Gregory Corso: Right on, And Allen told me, after that phone call, he said, “Gregory, Jack is the saddest of the lot”. (Now I was going through some rough times at that time too - Well, Allen said, “No, it’s Jack, Jack is probably going to be hurt the most out of all this”).  And so it was.

(Q: When was this?)
      
AG: Well, let's see, that would be the late ‘Sixties, very late ‘Sixties -  Sixty-seven? – Also I asked him what he thought about (Bob) Dylan, because I'd just met Dylan, and was hanging around, and I was trying to connect them, and he said he loved Dylan’s singing (which interested me because his real singer was (Frank) Sinatra. The last time.. the last time we met was..how long before he died?  I don’t know, maybe a year (before)?, he came up to New York to go on the William Buckley show

Gregory Corso: Right right
AG: And…
Gregory Corso: He went.. when?.. he died in October, (19)68?
AG: Yeah
John Clellon Holmes: Nine.
Gregory Corso: Nine, Sixty-Nine



AG: And he was..we were…he came up to William Burroughs’ hotel room, and Bill.. with a couple of Greek relatives, brothers-in-law -  and Bill refused to go down to the television studio with him. He asked him “Come on down, kid, come with me”, (he was drinking). I went along. Bill said ,”Jack, I don’t want to see this, this is going to be... You’re too drunk and I don’t want to be there”. And I said, “Okay, I’ll come”. So, when we came up in the elevator, Ed Sanders was there. And Jack had, actually, been manipulated (as had happened before) - he wasn’t told that he was not the only guest. Buckley had first invited him - and Sterling Lord, his agent had set him up for that - and then, it turned out, that Ed Sanders was also supposed to be on the panel, and a professor from Stony Brook, a sociology professor, I’ve forgotten his name [Lewis Yablonsky]. So Jack immediately began putting down Sanders in the elevator, saying , “I don’t know you”, and Sanders, very generously, said, “Jack, I’m your baby, I’m your child, I grew up under you, I grew up reading your books. I’m your.. whatever, I’m your product” (because Sanders knew that, Sanders knew, Ed Sanders knew, that he was a good product, so he wasn’t ashamed of proclaiming that). Jack didn’t know Sanders (or said he didn’t know Sanders’ work) and so put him down. They were all lined up on the tv set, Jack slumped in his chair. And (he) came on drunk, grudgingly. When Buckley asked him what he thought about the Vietnam War, Jack gave it back to him in one-hundred-percent redneck fashion, saying,”Ah, all those South Vietnamese want to do is get our jeeps, free (just as Paul Jarvis said ).It was apparently, like, a favorite redneck Lowell-type line..

David Amram: Allen?  can I mention one thing?

Paul Jarvis: That’s not true. I don’t think that’s true 
AG: Yeah, wasn’t it you who quoted that?
Paul Jarvis: I was with him two nights before he went down to the William Buckley show and that’s not a typical redneck idea in Lowell.
Gregory Corso: No, you mentioned the jeeps, man
AG: No, what I’m saying is that it’s a sort of ..
Paul Jarvis:  I have the audio..
AG: ..an honorific redneck.
Paul Jarvis: …of the Buckley show..
AG: Oh yes, so what did he say? What was the phrase?
Paul Jarvis: He didn’t make any redneck statement.
AG: No, he didn’t say, he didn’t say the word “redneck”.
Gregory Corso: He said..
AG: I said it was a redneck statement, not him.
Gregory Corso: ..his opinion.
AG: The statement was that all those South Vietnamese want to do is get our jeeps, that’s what he said. Is that your recollection?
Paul Jarvis: That’s not a redneck statement.
Gregory Corso: Aw, you’re just picking on him.
AG: That’s right, Paul, it’s not a redneck statement, it’s another kind of American statement, it’s American blue-collar statement, it’s a blue collar statement.
Gregory Corso: Okay, I think it’s the end of the ball game, guys. But let’s not end on that note, that

David Amram:  Allen, can I mention one thing? I have an answering-machine, one of those machines that answers your phone when you’re not there, and Jack called up a lot in the last few years, always very late at night .(In) 1968, the Houston Symphony had played a piece of mine. I set (the) Lonesome Traveler for chorus, solo, and symphony orchestra, and I did a show on PBS with the Houston Symphony. Jack saw it. And I was able to get the engineer to get a tape and send it down, and some (of the) other records. And he called up one time, 1969, and I think it was end of April, or May (I was just back off about four months of traveling all over the place), and he said, “Man”, he said, “every time I call(ed) up all I get is that damned machine!” (he would always leave a fantastic message with some scat-singing, some improvised poetry, and something insane saying “you’re not here” at the end of it, “this is Jacky”, at the end of the tape). I finally was there. So we talked for about an hour-and-a-half. He said, “Look”, he said, “You know I’m in one place, and you’re still traveling, going all over the place”, and he said, “Why don’t you stay in one place?” And I said, ”Well, I am in one place, just different areas of that one place”. And he said, “No”, he said, “did you ever think (and this what really flipped me out) did you ever think of lying in a hammock for three days looking up at the stars and just picking your teeth and letting the Zen-full feeling flow over you?”. And I thought about that, and of course I hadn’t done that. I’d never.. No, the only reason.. I’d never had the chance yet, but every time I really get tired (and I’m still out there travelling), I think about that, and what he said was so beautiful that just imagining doing that was really health-i-fying and relaxing. And he had a way, sometimes, of saying things, and putting things in your mind, that could really help you. 
So the very last conversation I ever had with him on the telephone he put that thought in my mindand every time I’m really tired I think about that and, much better than any kind of dope is to have a beautiful thought that can relax you, give you that tranquility and that peace. And on that note, since people have mentioned so much about (his) drinking, I never saw Jack, in all the time I knew him, (and we played at Brooklyn College for a poetry reading where there were all these kids that were dying to meet him and a lot of other places that we won’t go into because there’s no time), I never saw him offer a drink to anybody, I never saw him suggest drugs to anybody, (and we talked about that a lot - since I had been a gym teacher, we were both interested in sports). Whatever he did to himself, he knew wasn’t beneficial, and he did feel a responsibility to young people, at least to be decent to them, (and so much of what has been written about him really suggests the opposite), and he was really, as people said, a very moral person, very decent and very beautiful and caring person. And what he did to hurt himself, or to ease the hurt, was not something that he laid on other people. He had no shred of decadence within him. He might have destroyed himself, (as many people do), but he never had any..any kind of spiritual decadence, he was always a pure true spirit up until the very end. And I just wanted to say that, because I think maybe that might help to set the record a little straighter, (at least in one person’s picture).  
 
AG: Well I thought.. that’s a good idea.. Very swiftly, I’ll give my last shot on Kerouac. And then John (Clellon) Holmes and maybe Peter (Orlovsky)  and maybe Gregory (Corso)

John Clellon Holmes: As others have stated, he was in the habit of calling people, calling his close friends up when he was lonely, which was a good deal of the time. He mostly called at night, late in the night, and, depending on his condition, how long his evening had been, the conversation could spin on for two hours. The last time he called me (although I, of course, didn’t know it was going to be the last time) was in September of 1969, a little bit more than a month before he died, and he was extremely.. he wasn’t extremely drunk, he had clearly been drinking for a long time but mainly he was very sad and he talked and talked and talked and we talked (tho’ he mostly talked, he just wanted to talk to somebody) and this was in the late afternoon and I was due to go out some place and the hour crept on and I hadn’t taken a shower yet and I had to get ready to go out, and I said, “Jack, look, I’ve got to go up and draw…” - it was a bath, actually. I said, “I’ve got to go up and draw a bath”. He said, “Why are you turning me down?” . And I said, “I’m not turning you down, I’ve just got something else that I’ve got to do”. I was irritated, thoughtless. He said, “If you’re my friend… I’m going to hang up”, he said, “and if you’re my friend, you’ll call me back, when you’ve drawn your bath”. I didn’t call him back. I’m doing it now. 

GC: My last one? I was invited to read at Wellesley (College) in Massachusetts and Jack went along with me. And it was in (19)66 or (19)67. And no-one knew who he was, at that time - that was very odd – the students, they hardly knew. And being as I used to go to Harvard 
(I spent two years at Harvard), and that was nearby, so, let's go, Cambridge, you know, and see if I could meet any people I used to know there. And we went along. And they just had dances there, big parties, big jock parties at Lowell House, and things like that. And he was there drinking and dancing and no-one knew him! – total, you know – it was amazing, what was this? (19)66 (19)67 – huh? - Now they do, now they know him, but it was a real beauty to see that those guys there at that time wouldn’t recognize him. That was the last time that I encountered the man, (and, being that I was moving so much about, I had no telephone, so I didn’t get the calls, see).

Peter Orlovsky: I think it was on Tenth Street , between (Avenues) C and D in (19)67 maybe?  Do you remember when he came, the last time he came there?
AG: No. I remember the time he came for the DMT



Peter Orlovsky: On Tenth Street
AG: Yeah
Peter Orlovsky: And he was very drunk. And I think I grabbed him around the waist and tried to throw him in a tub of cold water to sober him up and he screamed at me to let him alone.
John Clellon Holmes: (And you tried to do that?) 
Peter Orlovsky: I think I grabbed him around  the waist from behind and I was going to throw him in a tub of cold water so he’d sober up and you [Allen] said leave him alone.
AG: What did he say?
Peter Orovsky: I don’t know. We got into a little bit of a rassling.
John Clellon Holmes: Wrestling?
Peter Orlovsky: Wrestling, yeah.
Gregory Corso: He wasn’t an alcoholic when I fisrt met him, you know. He started drinking after..since On The Road came out 
John Clellon Holmes Yeah
AG: So, what conclusion?
Gregory Corso: When we heard about his death, we were together, right?  You, me and Peter were together
AG: We were all up in Cherry Valley, New York, and went out into the woods and carved his initials on a tree
Gregory Corso: Right
John Clellon Holmes: And then you called me up and we arranged to meet the next afternoon to go to the funeral
AG: And so we prepared a funeral wreath which said – “Guard the heart”.

Sunday April 5 - Allen Ginsberg Parinirvana

$
0
0


[Allen Ginsberg performs "Father Death Blues"]

It's Allen Ginsberg'sparinirvanatoday, the (eighteenth) anniversary of his passing.

Here's Herbert Huncke, "godfather of  The Beats", on "the invisible body" - on witnessing funerals ("I'm inclined to think it was Hindu, but I'm not sure") - burning ghats, Indian ritual (Huncke footage, courtesy documentarian, Laki Vazakas)  


[Herbert Huncke at the Chelsea Hotel]

Here's Allen on the burning ghats (from an interview, 1994, with Suranjan Ganguly)

"SG: What was your experience ofthe burning ghats [of Benaras/Varanasi] ?

AG: I went there several time a week and stayed there very late at night. For one thing, I was amazed at the openness of death, the visibility of death which is hidden and powdered and rouged and buried in a coffin in the West. To suggest the opposite, the openness of it is like an education which is totally different from the cultivation of the notion of the corpse as still relevant and alive and "don't kick it over". There they just lay it out and burn it and the family watches the dissolution, they see emptiness in front of them, the emptiness of the body in front of them. So I had the opportunity to see the inside of the human body, to see the face cracked and torn, fallen off, the brains bubbling and burning. And reading Ramakrishna at the time - the dead body is nothing but an old pillow, an empty pillow, like burning an old pillow. Nothing to be afraid of. So it removed a lot of the fear of the corpse that we have in the West. And then I saw people singing outside on Thursday nights and other nights too. That was amazing, and the noise was rousing, very loud, and I would sit around, pay attention and listen, and try and get the words . I saw lady yogis meditating in the ash pit….

SG: In the (Indian) Journals, there are so many graphic details of bodies burning - (almost) as if you were getting high on death..

AG: I don't think I was. After all, death is half of life. I was just describing life as I saw it."

Gelek Rinpoche, Allen's (Tibetan) guru (and witness of his passing): "There is no question that Allen was concentrating on the Mahamudra and Vajrayoginiand that is how he went. It was a very successful death. Of course, to us it is a great loss, no question about that, not just for us but for society as a whole. However for him, he began his own celebration and it really was a celebration. And I probably should not say that we are very happy, but on the other hand we all have to die and you could not have a better death than that. We all wish to continue but we cannot. I said to Allen when he gave me the news, "We always think we could go on for some more years , but look at your life, you are seventy years old and have made a tremendous contribution"…I told Allen, "I don't think that in the (19)60's you thought you were going to live that long". And he said, "No, definitely not. If I had thought so, I would have taken care of myself a little better." Then I said, "you are seventy now, and although it is not a very long life, like one-hundred-and-fifteen or so, it is also not a short life either. So it is ok."

Rosebud Feliu-Pettet, in her moving and definitive account of Allen's last days (of his compassion, of the bodhisattva): "After being diagnosed with inoperable liver cancer the previous Friday at Beth Israel Hospital, (he) had been told he had maybe two to five months to live. When I heard the news, for some reason, I felt strongly that it would not be that long - I felt that he would go very soon. He had come back home Wednesday in good spirits, organizing things as ever, making plans for the coming days. But someone (I forget who, perhaps it was Bob Rosenthal) had said that Allen, personally, felt that he had very little time left. A month or two, he thought. So Wednesday he was busy, writing and making phone calls to his friends all over the world, saying goodbye. Amiri Baraka said Allen called him and said,"I'm dying, do you need any money?"  


[Lawrence Ferlinghetti reads "Allen Ginsberg Dying"]






Viewing all 1329 articles
Browse latest View live